No, not more important. But at the moment, more imperative.

In summary, the conversation is discussing the importance of getting a mission done, even if it means sacrificing lives. They also mention concerns about copycat killings and terrorism, and express interest in hearing about the 1% of ideas that might actually work. When asked about why 99% of ideas are not viable, the response is that they simply don't make sense and often fall short. The last comment expresses confusion and lack of understanding.
  • #1
mugaliens
197
1
Line from the movie Airport, circa 1:20:40.

I used to fly planes, so I understand getting the mission done is more important, but on rare occasion, saving lives was more imperative.

I'm concerned about these copycat killings/terrorist actions, but what to do?

99% of most ideas aren't viable. I'm interested in hearing about that 1% which just might work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mugaliens said:
99% of most ideas aren't viable. I'm interested in hearing about that 1% which just might work.

Why are 99% not viable? Is there something that shows this figure or is it purely your disagreement with what they propose?
 
  • #3
jarednjames said:
Why are 99% not viable? Is there something that shows this figure or is it purely your disagreement with what they propose?

No, reallly nothing, jared. They. We. Not making sens is the issue. Most of us don't quite cut the mustard.

We put the prattle out there, yet 99% of the time, it remains prattle.

Not making the grade.
 
  • #4
I'm sorry mugs, but your usual brilliantly well written post style eludes me in this one.

I quite literally can't read that properly, let alone understand it.
 
  • #5
I havn't seen this movie, so I guess I'm just missing the point of the 1st post.
 
  • #6
Drakkith said:
I havn't seen this movie, so I guess I'm just missing the point of the 1st post.

i think it's somewhere in the 99%
 

FAQ: No, not more important. But at the moment, more imperative.

What does it mean when someone says "No, not more important. But at the moment, more imperative."?

When someone says this, they are suggesting that although something may not necessarily be more important in the grand scheme of things, it is currently more urgent or necessary to address.

How is importance different from being imperative?

Importance refers to the significance or value of something, while being imperative means that something is crucial or essential to be done.

Can something be imperative but not important?

Yes, something can be imperative but not important. For example, a small task may be crucial to complete in order to move on to more important tasks.

Is there a time limit on something being imperative?

There is not necessarily a set time limit on something being imperative. It depends on the situation and context, as well as the urgency of the task at hand.

How can something be imperative at the moment but not in the long run?

Something may be imperative in the short term due to certain circumstances or deadlines, but it may not hold the same level of urgency or necessity in the long run.

Similar threads

Back
Top