No One-to-One Linear Transformation: V to W

In summary, the statement is trying to prove that if two finite-dimensional vector spaces have different dimensions, there exists no one-to-one linear transformation between them. One way to approach the proof is by finding concrete examples and examining the connection between the definition of dimension and one-to-one maps.
  • #1
hannahlu92
4
0

Homework Statement



Prove: If V and W are finite-dimensional vector spaces such that dim(W)<dim(V), then there is no one-to-one linear transformation T:V-->W




The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to do a well thought out proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hi hannahlu92! :smile:

The first thing you should do with such a statement is trying to find concrete examples. Can you find examples of V and W such that dim(V)<dim(W). Is it true that there doesn't exist such a one-to-one map for these examples? (I.e. is it inuitively true).

Then, to actually start proving it, you'll need to unwind the concept. What does dimension mean? What does one-to-one mean? Can we find some connection between the definition of dimension and the concept of one-to-one maps?
 
  • #3


thank you for taking the time to try and help me. My final is tomorrow and I still can't understand Linear Algebra
 

FAQ: No One-to-One Linear Transformation: V to W

What is a one-to-one linear transformation?

A one-to-one linear transformation is a mathematical function that maps each element in one vector space (V) to a unique element in another vector space (W). This means that no two elements in V are mapped to the same element in W.

How is a one-to-one linear transformation represented?

A one-to-one linear transformation can be represented by a matrix or a set of equations. The matrix representation is a square matrix with n columns and n rows, where n is the dimension of the vector space. The set of equations representation is expressed as a system of linear equations.

What does it mean for a transformation to be not one-to-one?

If a transformation is not one-to-one, it means that there exists at least one element in V that is mapped to more than one element in W. This can also be referred to as a many-to-one transformation.

How does the concept of one-to-one linear transformations relate to invertibility?

A one-to-one linear transformation is invertible, which means that there exists an inverse function that maps each element in W back to a unique element in V. This inverse function allows us to "undo" the original transformation, making it a useful concept in solving equations and finding solutions.

Can a linear transformation be both one-to-one and onto?

Yes, a linear transformation can be both one-to-one and onto. When this is the case, it is known as an isomorphism. An isomorphism is a bijective linear transformation, meaning that it is both one-to-one and onto, and it preserves the linear structure of the vector spaces.

Back
Top