Nomenclature of organic compounds

AI Thread Summary
The nomenclature of organic compounds primarily follows classical valence bonding rules, which do not account for electronic configurations. This means that names assigned to compounds may not reflect their electronic properties or electronegativity. For instance, CH2Cl2 is correctly named dichloromethane instead of alternatives that suggest different bonding characteristics. The replacement operation in nomenclature allows for naming compounds where skeletal atoms or functional groups are substituted. Understanding these conventions is crucial for accurate communication in organic chemistry.
Vernii
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Help me understand the following excerpt :-
It is very important to recognize that, in general, the rules of the nomenclature of organic compounds are written in terms of classical valence bonding and do not imply electronic configurations of any kind.

[Mentor Note -- Representative link added below]
https://www.acdlabs.com/iupac/nomenclature/93/r93_125.htm
The replacement operation can be used for naming organic compounds in which skeletal atoms of a parent structure are replaced by other skeletal atoms, or in which oxygen atom and/or hydroxy groups of characteristic groups are replaced by other atoms or groups.

It is very important to recognize that, in general, the rules of organic nomenclature are written in terms of classical valence bonding and do not imply electronic configurations of any kind.

Examples of naming structures in several ways are shown in Table 1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It means that the name won’t reflect electronic tendencies like electronegativity.

CH2Cl2 would be dichloromethane rather than methane dichloride or methylene chloride or methylene dichloride (implying the chlorine exists as Cl-).
 
Engineers slash iridium use in electrolyzer catalyst by 80%, boosting path to affordable green hydrogen https://news.rice.edu/news/2025/engineers-slash-iridium-use-electrolyzer-catalyst-80-boosting-path-affordable-green Ruthenium is also fairly expensive (a year ago it was about $490/ troy oz, but has nearly doubled in price over the past year, now about $910/ troy oz). I tracks prices of Pt, Pd, Ru, Ir and Ru. Of the 5 metals, rhodium (Rh) is the most expensive. A year ago, Rh and Ir...
Back
Top