MHB Non-dimensional differential equation 1

AI Thread Summary
A non-dimensional differential equation describes the height of a body thrown vertically upwards, given by d²x/dt² = -1 - μ(dx/dt) with initial conditions x(0)=0 and dx/dt(0)=1, where 0<μ<<1. The maximum height h(μ) is derived as h(μ) = 1/μ - (1/μ²) log_e(1+μ). The discussion involves solving this equation through integration, with a suggestion to use separation of variables. The first step involves substituting v = dx/dt and finding v as a function of time, leading to the expression v = (1/μ)((μ + 1)e^(-μt) - 1). The next steps include determining when v=0 to find the time at which the maximum height is reached.
ra_forever8
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
A body of constant mass is thrown vertically upwards from the ground. It can be shown that the appropriate non-dimensional differential equation for the height $x(t;u)$, reached at time $t\geq0$ is given by
\begin{equation} \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = -1-\mu (\frac{dx}{dt})
\end{equation}
with corresponding initial conditions $x(0)=0, \frac{dx}{dt}(0) =1$, and where $0<\mu<<1.$
Deduce that the (non-dimensional) height at the highest point (where $\frac{dx}{dt} =0$) is given by
\begin{equation} h(\mu)= \frac{1}{\mu}- \frac{1}{\mu^2} log_e(1+\mu) \end{equation}

=>
It really hard for me to start

I was thinking do integration twice by doing the separation of variable:
\begin{equation} \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = -1-\mu (\frac{dx}{dt})
\end{equation}
I got the general solution of \begin{equation}x(t)= \frac{log(t\mu +1) -t \mu}{\mu^2}\end{equation}

after that I do not know how to get the answer.
Please help me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Non-dimensional differential equation

grandy said:
A body of constant mass is thrown vertically upwards from the ground. It can be shown that the appropriate non-dimensional differential equation for the height $x(t;u)$, reached at time $t\geq0$ is given by
\begin{equation} \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = -1-\mu (\frac{dx}{dt})
\end{equation}
with corresponding initial conditions $x(0)=0, \frac{dx}{dt}(0) =1$, and where $0<\mu<<1.$
Deduce that the (non-dimensional) height at the highest point (where $\frac{dx}{dt} =0$) is given by
\begin{equation} h(\mu)= \frac{1}{\mu}- \frac{1}{\mu^2} log_e(1+\mu) \end{equation}

=>
It really hard for me to start

I was thinking do integration twice by doing the separation of variable:
\begin{equation} \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = -1-\mu (\frac{dx}{dt})
\end{equation}
I got the general solution of \begin{equation}x(t)= \frac{log(t\mu +1) -t \mu}{\mu^2}\end{equation}

after that I do not know how to get the answer.
Please help me.

Your method is the right approach.

Let me show you the first step to find $v$.

Let $v=\frac {dx}{dt}$ and let $\dot v = \frac {d^2x}{dt^2}$.
Then:
\begin{array}{}
\dot v &=& -1 - \mu v \\
\frac{\dot v}{1 + \mu v} &=& -1 \\
\frac 1 \mu \ln(1+\mu v) &=& -t + C \\
v &=& C' e^{-\mu t} - \frac 1 \mu \\
\end{array}

Applying the boundary condition $v(0)=1$ yields:
$$v = \frac 1 \mu((\mu + 1)e^{-\mu t} - 1)$$

From here you can find the time $t$ at which $v=0$.
And you can also integrate again to find $x$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top