Non-dimensionalizing the N-S equations

  • Thread starter hanson
  • Start date
In summary: However, it may be more convenient to use the first approach for computational purposes. In summary, the choice of characteristic variable in non-dimensionalizing the N-S equations is important and can affect the resulting equations and their interpretation. The two versions of Stokes equations differ mainly in their scaling of time, with the second approach being more suitable for transient cases. It may be more convenient to use the first approach for computational purposes. There is no clear consensus on which approach is better, and it ultimately depends on the specific problem being studied.
  • #1
hanson
319
0
In non-dimensionalizing the N-S equations, are the choices of the characteristic variable important? I am currently reading the Stokes approximation to the N-S equation and find two versions of Stokes equations. They have used different scaling in their derivation and I find no clue in understanding the importance of scaling and am wondering if someone here can help me out.

Please kindly read the figure attached.

While the version 1 has characterise the time by U and L, version2 uses the kinemtic viscosity to scale the time. Are there any difference between these two approaches? I don't know what kind of difference will be produced and what effect would different choice of scales bring out. Could anyone explain clearly?

And are the two versions of Stokes equation the same? If not, what are the differences?

I find no clue in non-dimensionalization...
 

Attachments

  • stokes equation.JPG
    stokes equation.JPG
    20.2 KB · Views: 636
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
hanson said:
In non-dimensionalizing the N-S equations, are the choices of the characteristic variable important? I am currently reading the Stokes approximation to the N-S equation and find two versions of Stokes equations. They have used different scaling in their derivation and I find no clue in understanding the importance of scaling and am wondering if someone here can help me out.

Please kindly read the figure attached.

While the version 1 has characterise the time by U and L, version2 uses the kinemtic viscosity to scale the time. Are there any difference between these two approaches? I don't know what kind of difference will be produced and what effect would different choice of scales bring out. Could anyone explain clearly?

And are the two versions of Stokes equation the same? If not, what are the differences?

I find no clue in non-dimensionalization...
The only real difference between these two approaches is in the definition of the dimensionless time. The second approach looks more appropriate for considering the transient case.
 

FAQ: Non-dimensionalizing the N-S equations

What is the purpose of non-dimensionalizing the Navier-Stokes equations?

The purpose of non-dimensionalizing the Navier-Stokes equations is to simplify and generalize the equations so they can be applied to a wide range of fluid flows. By removing specific units and scaling the variables, the equations become more universal and easier to solve.

How do you non-dimensionalize the Navier-Stokes equations?

The Navier-Stokes equations can be non-dimensionalized by dividing each variable by a characteristic value, such as the characteristic length, velocity, or time of the flow. This transforms the equations into dimensionless form, where all variables are expressed relative to the characteristic values.

What are the benefits of non-dimensionalizing the Navier-Stokes equations?

Non-dimensionalizing the Navier-Stokes equations allows for easier comparison between different fluid flows and simplifies the equations for analytical and numerical solutions. It also helps in identifying the key parameters that influence the flow behavior and allows for more efficient modeling and experimentation.

Are there any limitations to non-dimensionalizing the Navier-Stokes equations?

While non-dimensionalizing the Navier-Stokes equations can greatly simplify the equations, it may also lead to loss of physical insight and accuracy. This is because the characteristic values used for non-dimensionalization may not fully capture all the complex features of the flow, and certain assumptions may need to be made in the process.

Can non-dimensionalizing the Navier-Stokes equations be applied to all types of fluid flows?

Non-dimensionalizing the Navier-Stokes equations can be applied to a wide range of fluid flows, including both laminar and turbulent flows. However, the choice of characteristic values and assumptions made during the process may vary depending on the type of flow and the specific problem being solved.

Similar threads

A Why are the Navier-Stokes equations inconsistent in this case?
Replies
18
Views
2K
Hyperelasticity - Mooney-Rivlin stress equation
Replies
5
Views
1K
Fluid Dynamic: Stokeslet? Rotlet?
Replies
16
Views
18K
B Help Scaling Gravity Simulation
Replies
7
Views
2K
Automotive Need help calculating load torque and acceleration torque of a vehicle
Replies
8
Views
5K
Time to empty gas cylinder (problem worked, but would like feedback)
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Acceleration in Newton's second law
Replies
5
Views
1K
Air Friction energy loss on a trampoline
Replies
13
Views
2K
Rocket acceleration problem: confused about Newton's 2nd Law
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
I Solve equation from dimensional analysis: 3 eq., 6 unknowns
Replies
1
Views
619

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top