Non Riemann Integrable multiplication of functions

You just need to justify why (fg)(t) is not integrable. You can use the same argument as for (b). You can also use the fact that t^a is integrable on (0,1] if a>-1 and not integrable on (0,1] if a<=-1.
  • #1
looserlama
30
0

Homework Statement



Do the following:

(a) find an interval I and functions f, g: I → R such that f and g are both Riemann integrable, but f g is not Riemann integrable.

(b) find an interval I and functions f, g: I → R such that f and g are both Riemann integrable, but g ◦ f is not Riemann integrable.


Homework Equations



Apparently there are a couple ways to define the Riemann integral, so this is the definition we're using. It obviously shouldn't matter for this question, but just for notation I guess.

For a function f on a compact time domain [a,b]:

If {Pj} is a sequence of partitions of [a,b] with j intervals Ij.

We say that f is Riemann integrable if lim as j→∞ of (A+(f,Pj) - A-(f,Pj)) = 0, i.e. [itex]\forall[/itex]ε > 0, [itex]\exists[/itex] N such that [itex]\forall[/itex]j ≥ N |A+(f,Pj) - A-(f,Pj)| < ε.

Where A+(f,Pj) = Ʃ(sup{f(t)|t[itex]\in[/itex]Ij} length(Ij)).

And A- is the same but with inf instead of sup.

For an unbounded function f on a non-compact time-domain T:

If f is Riemann integrable on any compact subset of T, then we basically just find the limit as the bounds of the integral approach the end of the interval T. If this integral exits, then f is Riemann intagrable.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I managed to do (b), so here it is:

On I = [0,1)

g(t) = [itex]\frac{1}{t + 1}[/itex] and f(t) = t - 1

Clearly these are both Riemann integrable on [0,1).

But then (g ◦ f)(t) = [itex]\frac{1}{t}[/itex]

So ∫1/t dt = [ln|t|]from a to 1 = -ln(a) for 0<a<1.

Then lim as a→0 of -ln(a) is not defined.

Therefore g ◦ f is not Riemann integrable.

(I don't know if this is sufficient? Does this actually mean g ◦ f is not Riemann intagrable or is it just unbounded? Or are those equivalent? We just started this subject so I don't understand it that well yet.)

For (a):

I basically have no idea, I know it can't be done on a compact set, but apart from that I have no idea.

Any help for this would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your solution for (b) is fine. [itex]g \circ f[/itex] is not Riemann integrable because its graph near x = 0 is too "thick" to have finite area. Putting it another way, the function's value grows too rapidly as x approaches 0.

For (a), there's a simple example with f = g. Try to choose a function f such f^2 grows too rapidly as x approaches 0, but f grows slowly enough that you can integrate it.
 
  • #3
looserlama said:

Homework Statement



Do the following:

(a) find an interval I and functions f, g: I → R such that f and g are both Riemann integrable, but f g is not Riemann integrable.

(b) find an interval I and functions f, g: I → R such that f and g are both Riemann integrable, but g ◦ f is not Riemann integrable.

Homework Equations



Apparently there are a couple ways to define the Riemann integral, so this is the definition we're using. It obviously shouldn't matter for this question, but just for notation I guess.

For a function f on a compact time domain [a,b]:

If {Pj} is a sequence of partitions of [a,b] with j intervals Ij.

We say that f is Riemann integrable if lim as j→∞ of (A+(f,Pj) - A-(f,Pj)) = 0, i.e. [itex]\forall[/itex]ε > 0, [itex]\exists[/itex] N such that [itex]\forall[/itex]j ≥ N |A+(f,Pj) - A-(f,Pj)| < ε.

Where A+(f,Pj) = Ʃ(sup{f(t)|t[itex]\in[/itex]Ij} length(Ij)).

And A- is the same but with inf instead of sup.

For an unbounded function f on a non-compact time-domain T:

If f is Riemann integrable on any compact subset of T, then we basically just find the limit as the bounds of the integral approach the end of the interval T. If this integral exits, then f is Riemann intagrable.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I managed to do (b), so here it is:

On I = [0,1)

g(t) = [itex]\frac{1}{t + 1}[/itex] and f(t) = t - 1

Clearly these are both Riemann integrable on [0,1).

But then (g ◦ f)(t) = [itex]\frac{1}{t}[/itex]

So ∫1/t dt = [ln|t|]from a to 1 = -ln(a) for 0<a<1.

Then lim as a→0 of -ln(a) is not defined.

Therefore g ◦ f is not Riemann integrable.

(I don't know if this is sufficient? Does this actually mean g ◦ f is not Riemann intagrable or is it just unbounded? Or are those equivalent? We just started this subject so I don't understand it that well yet.)

For (a):

I basically have no idea, I know it can't be done on a compact set, but apart from that I have no idea.

Any help for this would be greatly appreciated!

You've got the first part. Your function is both unbounded and not integrable since the limit doesn't exist. There are functions that are unbounded that ARE integrable. Try t^(-1/3) on (0,1]. Does that give you any ideas for (a)?
 
  • #4
Oh, I didn't think of that at all.

So if I chose f(t) = t-1/3 and g(t) = t-2/3 or just f(t) = g(t) = t-1/2

Then (fg)(t) = [itex]\frac{1}{t}[/itex] which is not Riemann Integrable on I = (0,1] right?

Thanks so much for your guys!
 
  • #5
looserlama said:
Oh, I didn't think of that at all.

So if I chose f(t) = t-1/3 and g(t) = t-2/3 or just f(t) = g(t) = t-1/2

Then (fg)(t) = [itex]\frac{1}{t}[/itex] which is not Riemann Integrable on I = (0,1] right?

Thanks so much for your guys!

Sure, those are fine examples.
 

FAQ: Non Riemann Integrable multiplication of functions

1. What does it mean for a function to be non-Riemann integrable?

Non-Riemann integrability refers to a mathematical function that cannot be evaluated using the traditional Riemann integral method. This means that the area under the curve of the function cannot be calculated using the standard integration techniques.

2. How is the multiplication of two non-Riemann integrable functions defined?

The multiplication of two non-Riemann integrable functions is defined using the Lebesgue integral, which is a more general form of integration that can handle functions that are not Riemann integrable. This method involves breaking the function into smaller intervals and calculating the area under the curve for each interval.

3. Can non-Riemann integrable functions still be used in practical applications?

Yes, non-Riemann integrable functions are still commonly used in practical applications, especially in areas like economics, physics, and engineering. The Lebesgue integral allows for a more flexible and comprehensive way of evaluating these functions, making them useful in various real-world scenarios.

4. How does the non-Riemann integrable multiplication of functions differ from the traditional multiplication of functions?

The main difference between the non-Riemann integrable multiplication of functions and the traditional multiplication of functions is in the method of integration. Traditional multiplication uses the Riemann integral, which has strict requirements for a function to be integrable, while non-Riemann integrable multiplication uses the Lebesgue integral, which is more versatile and can handle a wider range of functions.

5. Are there any drawbacks to using non-Riemann integrable functions?

One of the drawbacks of using non-Riemann integrable functions is that the calculation of the Lebesgue integral can be more complex and time-consuming compared to the Riemann integral. Additionally, some properties of Riemann integrable functions may not hold for non-Riemann integrable functions, which can be challenging for some mathematical applications.

Similar threads

Back
Top