Nonconducting Rod: How to Determine Electric Potential at x=L+d?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gogeta007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric Rod
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at a point x = L + d from a nonconducting rod with a linear charge density given by λ = αx. The user attempts to derive the potential using the formula V = q/4πεr and integrating the charge elements, but encounters difficulties with the integration process. A critical error identified is in the expression for the distance between the charge element and the point of interest, which should reflect that the distance is greater than d. The correct approach involves reevaluating the distance and properly setting up the integral. Ultimately, the correct potential expression is V = (α/4πε) ((L + d) ln(1 + L/d) - L).
Gogeta007
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a nonconducting rod of negligible thickness located along the x axis; its ends have coordinates x = 0 and x = L. It has a positive, nonuniform, linear charge density (lambda) = (alpha)x; alpha is constant. An infinite distance away, th eelectric potential is zero. Show that th electric potential at the location x=L+d is given by:

V= ( alpha/4pi(epsilon0) ) ( (L+d) ln(1+L/d) -L )

Homework Equations



V= q/4pi epsilon r


The Attempt at a Solution



V = integral of dv
dv= dq/4pi(epsilon)r
dq=lambdadx
dq= alpha x dx

dV = ( (alpha) x dx) / (4 pi epsilon (d-x) )

V=constants <integral> xdx/ d-x <===== integration table

<integral> udu/a+bu = 1/b2 (a + bu - a*ln(a + bu) <evaluate from 0 to L>

when I evaluate i get:

(constants) * d-d-L d*ln( d / d - L )

and that's not what I am supposed to get =/



ty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression d - x for the distance between your charge element and the location of interest is incorrect. Read the problem. The point of interest is at distance d from the end of the rod at x = L, so any point on the rod must be at distance greater than d from the point of interest. Draw a picture and see for yourself what that distance ought to be.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K