Norm of a Linear Transformation .... Junnheng Proposition 9.2.3 .... ....

In summary, the conversation discusses Proposition 9.2.3 and Definition 9.2.2 from Chapter 9 of Hugo D. Junghenn's book "A Course in Real Analysis." The conversation focuses on the proof of Proposition 9.2.3 and the substitution of $c = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}$ in the equation $\| c \mathbf{y}\| = c\| \mathbf{y}\|$. The conversation also addresses a mistake in the equation $\| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \le 1$ and clarifies that it should be $\| T ( \| \mathbf{x}
  • #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
3,998
48
I am reading Hugo D. Junghenn's book: "A Course in Real Analysis" ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 9: "Differentiation on \(\displaystyle \mathbb{R}^n\)"

I need some help with the proof of Proposition 9.2.3 ...

Proposition 9.2.3 and the preceding relevant Definition 9.2.2 read as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7889
View attachment 7890
In the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... If \(\displaystyle \mathbf{x} \neq \mathbf{0}\) then \(\displaystyle \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x}\) has a norm \(\displaystyle 1\), hence


\(\displaystyle \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \| T \mathbf{x} \| = \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \le 1\) ... ... "
Now I know that \(\displaystyle T( c \mathbf{x} ) = c T( \mathbf{x} ) \)... BUT ...... how do we know that this works "under the norm sign" ...... that is, how do we know ...\(\displaystyle \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \| T \mathbf{x} \| = \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \)
... and further ... how do we know that ...
\(\displaystyle \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \le 1 \)Help will be appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Peter said:
I know that \(\displaystyle T( c \mathbf{x} ) = c T( \mathbf{x} ) \)

... BUT ...

... how do we know that this works "under the norm sign" ...

... that is, how do we know ...

\(\displaystyle \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \| T \mathbf{x} \| = \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \)
If you make the substitution $c = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}$ in the equation $\| c \mathbf{y}\| = c\| \mathbf{y}\|$ (where $c$ is a positive constant), then it becomes $\| \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{y}\| = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}\| \mathbf{y}\|$. Do that when $\mathbf{y} = T\mathbf{x}$, to get $\| \|T( \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x})\| = \| \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}(T \mathbf{x})\| = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}\|T \mathbf{x}\|$.

Peter said:
... and further ... how do we know that ...

\(\displaystyle \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \le 1 \)
That is a mistake. It should read \(\displaystyle \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \le \|T\| \).
 
  • #3
Opalg said:
If you make the substitution $c = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}$ in the equation $\| c \mathbf{y}\| = c\| \mathbf{y}\|$ (where $c$ is a positive constant), then it becomes $\| \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{y}\| = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}\| \mathbf{y}\|$. Do that when $\mathbf{y} = T\mathbf{x}$, to get $\| \|T( \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x})\| = \| \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}(T \mathbf{x})\| = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}\|T \mathbf{x}\|$.That is a mistake. It should read \(\displaystyle \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \le \|T\| \).
Thanks Opalg ...

Appreciate your help ...

Peter
 
  • #4
Opalg said:
If you make the substitution $c = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}$ in the equation $\| c \mathbf{y}\| = c\| \mathbf{y}\|$ (where $c$ is a positive constant), then it becomes $\| \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{y}\| = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}\| \mathbf{y}\|$. Do that when $\mathbf{y} = T\mathbf{x}$, to get $\| \|T( \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x})\| = \| \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}(T \mathbf{x})\| = \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1}\|T \mathbf{x}\|$.That is a mistake. It should read \(\displaystyle \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \le \|T\| \).

Hi Opalg ...

Just realized that I don't fully understand why \(\displaystyle \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \le \|T\| \) ...

Can you please help further and demonstrate why this is the case ...

Peter
 
  • #5
Peter said:
Hi Opalg ...

Just realized that I don't fully understand why \(\displaystyle \| T ( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} ) \| \le \|T\| \) ...

Can you please help further and demonstrate why this is the case ...

Peter
The definition $\|T\| = \sup\{\|T \mathbf{y} \| : \| \mathbf{y} \| = 1\}$ says that if $\| \mathbf{y} \| = 1$ then $\|T \mathbf{y} \| \leqslant \|T\|$. But $ \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} $ has norm $1$, so you can substitute that vector for $ \mathbf{y}$, to get $\bigl\|T( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} )\bigr\| \leqslant \|T\|$.
 
  • #6
Opalg said:
The definition $\|T\| = \sup\{\|T \mathbf{y} \| : \| \mathbf{y} \| = 1\}$ says that if $\| \mathbf{y} \| = 1$ then $\|T \mathbf{y} \| \leqslant \|T\|$. But $ \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} $ has norm $1$, so you can substitute that vector for $ \mathbf{y}$, to get $\bigl\|T( \| \mathbf{x} \|^{-1} \mathbf{x} )\bigr\| \leqslant \|T\|$.
Hi Opalg ... thanks again for the help ...

Peter
 

FAQ: Norm of a Linear Transformation .... Junnheng Proposition 9.2.3 .... ....

What is the norm of a linear transformation?

The norm of a linear transformation is a measure of the size or magnitude of the transformation. It is a non-negative real number that represents the maximum amount by which the transformation can change the length of a vector.

How is the norm of a linear transformation calculated?

The norm of a linear transformation is calculated using the formula ||T|| = sup{||T(x)|| : x ∈ V and ||x|| = 1}, where sup stands for the supremum or the least upper bound. Essentially, it is the maximum value of ||T(x)|| as x ranges over all possible unit vectors in the vector space V.

What is the significance of the norm of a linear transformation?

The norm of a linear transformation is important because it tells us how much the transformation can stretch or compress vectors in the vector space. It is also useful in determining the convergence of a sequence of linear transformations and in solving optimization problems.

How is the norm of a linear transformation related to the eigenvalues of the transformation?

The norm of a linear transformation is equal to the absolute value of the largest eigenvalue of the transformation. This means that the norm can also be used to find the eigenvalues of a linear transformation.

Can the norm of a linear transformation ever be negative?

No, the norm of a linear transformation is always a non-negative real number. This is because it represents the maximum amount by which the transformation can change the length of a vector, and a negative length is not possible.

Back
Top