- #1
goulio
- 15
- 0
Hello,
I'm preparing for my condensed matter exam and I'm trying to solve problem 3a) of chapter 22 in Ashcroft & Mermin. The problem is basically to prove that the dispersion relation of a diatomic linear chain will reduce to the monoatomic one when the coupling constants are equal, [itex]K=G=K_0[/itex]. Starting off with equation (22.37)
[tex]
\omega^2 = \frac{K+G}{M} \pm \frac{1}{M}\sqrt{K^2 + G^2 + 2KG \cos k a}
[/tex]
I get
[tex]
\omega^2 = \frac{2 K_0}{M}(1 \pm | \cos \[(k a)/2 \] | )
[/tex]
if we take the minus sign (and ignore the absolute value) we get back to the monoatomic result with a lattice constant of [itex]a/2[/itex]. But why would prefer the minus sign and remove the absolute value?
Thanks
I'm preparing for my condensed matter exam and I'm trying to solve problem 3a) of chapter 22 in Ashcroft & Mermin. The problem is basically to prove that the dispersion relation of a diatomic linear chain will reduce to the monoatomic one when the coupling constants are equal, [itex]K=G=K_0[/itex]. Starting off with equation (22.37)
[tex]
\omega^2 = \frac{K+G}{M} \pm \frac{1}{M}\sqrt{K^2 + G^2 + 2KG \cos k a}
[/tex]
I get
[tex]
\omega^2 = \frac{2 K_0}{M}(1 \pm | \cos \[(k a)/2 \] | )
[/tex]
if we take the minus sign (and ignore the absolute value) we get back to the monoatomic result with a lattice constant of [itex]a/2[/itex]. But why would prefer the minus sign and remove the absolute value?
Thanks
Last edited: