Normal vector of an embedding surface

AI Thread Summary
The normal vector of an embedding surface can be calculated using the formula n^μ = g^{μν} ∂ν S. To express n^μ in terms of U, the surface S must first be rewritten as a function of U: S = S(U). The normal vector is then derived by taking the partial derivative of S with respect to U and applying the chain rule to transform it back into terms of t and x, using U = (t - f(x)). This transformation allows for further calculations, such as determining the area of the surface or the mean curvature. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing the properties of the embedding surface.
shinobi20
Messages
277
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
Given an AdS-Schwarzschild metric in ##(t, z, x, x_i)## coordinates, embed a surface (actually it is a null hypersurface) given by the constraint ##dV = 0## (##S = -t+x ##) using the lightcone coordinates. What is the normal vector along this surface, i.e. along the ##U##-direction?
Relevant Equations
AdS-Schwarzschild metric:
##ds^2 = \frac{1}{z^2} \left( -f(z) dt^2 + \frac{dz^2}{f(z)} + dx^2 +\sum_{i=1}^{d-1} (dx_i)^2 \right), \qquad f(z) = 1-\left(\frac{z}{z_h}\right)^{d+1}##

Lightcone coordinates:
##dU = dt + dx##
##dV = dt - dx##

Metric in lightcone coordinates
##ds^2 = \frac{1}{z^2} \left[ \frac{z^{d+1}}{z_h^{d+1}} \cdot \frac{dU^2 + dV^2}{4} + \left( -2 + \frac{z^{d+1}}{z_h^{d+1}} \right) \frac{dUdV}{2} + \frac{dz^2}{f(z)} + \sum_{i=1}^{d-1} (dx_i)^2 \right]##

Surface in lightcone coordinates:
##ds^2 = \frac{1}{z^2} \left[ \frac{z^{d+1}}{4 z_h^{d+1}} \cdot dU^2 + \frac{dz^2}{f(z)} + \sum_{i=1}^{d-1} (dx_i)^2 \right]##

Surface:
S = -t + x
I will only care about the ##t## and ##x## coordinates so that ##(t, z, x, x_i) \rightarrow (t,x)##.

The normal vector is given by,

##n^\mu = g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\nu S ##

How do I calculate ##n^\mu## in terms of ##U## given that the surface is written in terms of ##t## and ##x##?

Also, after calculating ##n^\mu## in terms of ##U##, how do I transform it back in terms of ##t## and ##x##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To calculate the normal vector in terms of U, we first need to rewrite the surface in terms of U. We can do this by writing S as a function of U:##S = S(U)##Now we can calculate the normal vector by taking the partial derivative of S with respect to U:##n^\mu = g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\nu S = g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\nu S(U)##To transform this back into terms of t and x, we can use the chain rule and the definition of U:##U = (t - f(x))##We can then rewrite the normal vector as:##n^\mu = g^{\mu\nu} \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} \frac{\partial U}{\partial t} \frac{\partial t}{\partial x} + g^{\mu\nu} \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} = g^{\mu\nu} \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} (-1) \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} + g^{\mu\nu} \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} ##Now that the normal vector is expressed in terms of t and x, we can use it to calculate other quantities such as the area of the surface or the mean curvature.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top