- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading D.G. Northcott's book: Lessons on Rings and Modules and Multiplicities.
I am currently studying Chapter 2: Prime Ideals and Primary Submodules.
I need help with an aspect of the proof Proposition 3 in Chapter 2 concerning the demonstration that all the maximal elements of \(\displaystyle \Omega\) are prime ideals.Proposition 3 and its proof read as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3714
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3715
In Northcott's proof above, we read the following:
" ... ... Let \(\displaystyle C\) consist of all elements that can be expressed in the form \(\displaystyle r \alpha + \pi\) where \(\displaystyle r \in R\) and \(\displaystyle \pi \in P\). It is a simple matter to check that \(\displaystyle C\) is an ideal containing \(\displaystyle P\). Indeed, since \(\displaystyle \alpha = 1 \alpha + 0\), \(\displaystyle \alpha \in C\) and therefore C strictly contains P. However P is maximal in \(\displaystyle \Omega\). It therefore follows that \(\displaystyle C\) meets \(\displaystyle S\). ... ... "
I do not fully understand why, in the above argument, it follows that \(\displaystyle C\) meets \(\displaystyle S\).
Can someone show formally and rigorously whhy, exactly, it follows that \(\displaystyle C\) meets \(\displaystyle S\).
Help will be appreciated ... ...
Peter
I am currently studying Chapter 2: Prime Ideals and Primary Submodules.
I need help with an aspect of the proof Proposition 3 in Chapter 2 concerning the demonstration that all the maximal elements of \(\displaystyle \Omega\) are prime ideals.Proposition 3 and its proof read as follows:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3714
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3715
In Northcott's proof above, we read the following:
" ... ... Let \(\displaystyle C\) consist of all elements that can be expressed in the form \(\displaystyle r \alpha + \pi\) where \(\displaystyle r \in R\) and \(\displaystyle \pi \in P\). It is a simple matter to check that \(\displaystyle C\) is an ideal containing \(\displaystyle P\). Indeed, since \(\displaystyle \alpha = 1 \alpha + 0\), \(\displaystyle \alpha \in C\) and therefore C strictly contains P. However P is maximal in \(\displaystyle \Omega\). It therefore follows that \(\displaystyle C\) meets \(\displaystyle S\). ... ... "
I do not fully understand why, in the above argument, it follows that \(\displaystyle C\) meets \(\displaystyle S\).
Can someone show formally and rigorously whhy, exactly, it follows that \(\displaystyle C\) meets \(\displaystyle S\).
Help will be appreciated ... ...
Peter
Last edited: