MHB Not all the roots are real iff a^2_1<a_2

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
AI Thread Summary
The equation presented is a polynomial with real coefficients, specifically structured as \(x^n + a_1x^{n-1} + a_2x^{n-2} + \ldots + a_n = 0\), where it is established that \(a_1^2 < a_2\). By applying Newton's identities, the sum of the squares of the roots, \(x_1^2 + x_2^2 + \ldots + x_n^2\), is equal to \(a_1^2 - a_2\). Since \(a_1^2 < a_2\), this sum is negative, indicating that not all roots can be real, as the sum of squares of real numbers must be non-negative. The conclusion drawn is that the condition \(a_1^2 < a_2\) ensures the existence of non-real roots in the polynomial.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Given the equation
$$x^n + a_1x^{n-1}+a_2x^{n-2}+…+a_n = 0$$
- with real coefficients, and $a_1^2 < a_2$.

Show that not all the roots are real.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Given the equation
$$x^n + a_1x^{n-1}+a_2x^{n-2}+…+a_n = 0$$
- with real coefficients, and $a_1^2 < a_2$.

Show that not all the roots are real.
[sp]If the roots are $x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n$ then by one of Newton's identities $x_1^2 + x_2^2 + \ldots + x_n^2 = a_1^2 - a_2$. If all the roots are real then the sum of their squares would have to be positive. But if $a_1^2 < a_2$ then that sum is negative. So not all the roots can be real.

[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]If the roots are $x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n$ then by one of Newton's identities $x_1^2 + x_2^2 + \ldots + x_n^2 = a_1^2 - a_2$. If all the roots are real then the sum of their squares would have to be positive. But if $a_1^2 < a_2$ then that sum is negative. So not all the roots can be real.

[/sp]

Thankyou, Opalg, for your participation. Your solution is - of course - correct.(Cool)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top