Nuclear electricity separator - for those really picky customers

In summary, the conversation touches on various energy-related topics such as nuclear power, wind energy, carbon capture, and eco-friendly inventions. However, some of the ideas discussed may be considered unrealistic or not feasible.
  • #1
misgfool
I just read that back in the 80's our brilliant engineers developed a nuclear electricity separator, which returns all electricity generated by nuclear power back to the grid, so that even anti-nuclear homeowners could use electricity. Would you buy one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
infinite series resistances installed on the service of anti-nuclear homeowners is the way to go. yes, i would buy them one. let's make this a national subsidized project.
 
  • #3
Proton Soup said:
let's make this a national subsidized project.

Indeed, but should we prioritize this higher than building bridges to nowhere?
 
  • #4
misgfool said:
Indeed, but should we prioritize this higher than building bridges to nowhere?

i can install these wireless interfaces for a nominal fee. in fact, the program will pay for itself in the first year.
 
  • #5
misgfool said:
I just read that back in the 80's our brilliant engineers developed a nuclear electricity separator, which returns all electricity generated by nuclear power back to the grid, so that even anti-nuclear homeowners could use electricity. Would you buy one?

Hell no. Nuclear power is absolutely the best energy source to date, bar none. Everything else is either heavily CO2-emitting (coal, natural gas, oil) or has extravagant resource or land use requirements (hydropower, biomass, solar, wind, wave, tidal). But nuclear is at the intersection of - clean, compact, cheap. It is optimal.
 
  • #6
We can see how the idea really took off. :rolleyes:

The real question is: Did anyone actually buy one?

This thread strikes me as a thinly veiled attempt to discredit the anti-nuclear-power crowd by implication without even offering evidence for the implication - a Foxism.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
I'm not sure if this thread was intended to be serious or not...
 
  • #8
I really hate wind...it just sort of scares me. Could I get a device to filter out wind-generated energy?
 
  • #9
this message is printed on 100% recycled electrons.
 
  • #10
lisab said:
I really hate wind...it just sort of scares me. Could I get a device to filter out wind-generated energy?

Or maybe Disney energy? I hear it comes from the exploitation of animated animals, the poor cute little things.
 
  • #11
misgfool said:
should we prioritize this higher than building bridges to nowhere?

It depends. Do a bunch of minor idiots outweigh one world-class idiot?
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
This thread strikes me as a thinly veiled attempt to discredit the anti-nuclear-power crowd by implication without even offering evidence for the implication - a Foxism.

russ_watters said:
I'm not sure if this thread was intended to be serious or not...

Actually you are both right simultaneously. This article appeared in a respected university Mayday magazine in the 80's. The release appears once on every odd year and has so far appeared in the form a magazine, egg, milk can, tuna can etc. It typically has a fairly high humor value.
 
  • #13
lisab said:
I really hate wind...it just sort of scares me. Could I get a device to filter out wind-generated energy?

I thought once that ground level wind energy was the most ludicrous idea, but then I heard of carbon capture.
 
  • #14
My 10 year old produces "wind" with gale force...that can burn too.
 
  • #15
lisab said:
I really hate wind...it just sort of scares me. Could I get a device to filter out wind-generated energy?

Sure. If you pay for me flying there and back again I am going to install you one for free :wink:
 
  • #16
WhoWee said:
My 10 year old produces "wind" with gale force...that can burn too.

Speaking of which... we ate cooked sauerkraut for dinner tonight.
 
  • #17
misgfool said:
I thought once that ground level wind energy was the most ludicrous idea, but then I heard of carbon capture.

If that's the stupidest idea you've heard about, you are one lucky bastard. http://www.tuvie.com/environmentally-friendly-solar-shades-canopies

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/science_news/4224574.html

Grad student invents gravity lamp

http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1383/

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/12/coffee-grounds-could-power-your-car.php

http://www.ecofriend.org/entry/eco-friendly-turbines-generate-power-from-a-flushing-toilet/ I think the mods will ban me for this...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #18
signerror said:
If that's the stupidest idea you've heard about, you are one lucky bastard.


http://www.tuvie.com/environmentally-friendly-solar-shades-canopies

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/science_news/4224574.html

Grad student invents gravity lamp

http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1383/

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/12/coffee-grounds-could-power-your-car.php

http://www.ecofriend.org/entry/eco-friendly-turbines-generate-power-from-a-flushing-toilet/


I think the mods will ban me for this...


I have to wonder if any of these are eligible for stimulus funding?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #19
signerror said:
If that's the stupidest idea you've heard about, you are one lucky bastard.

...

I think the mods will ban me for this...

But those ideas are not considered seriously
 

FAQ: Nuclear electricity separator - for those really picky customers

What is a nuclear electricity separator?

A nuclear electricity separator is a device that is used to separate electricity generated by nuclear power plants from other forms of electricity. It is a crucial component in the process of generating nuclear energy.

How does a nuclear electricity separator work?

A nuclear electricity separator works by using magnets to separate the positively charged particles (protons) from the negatively charged particles (electrons) in the electricity generated by a nuclear power plant. This creates a flow of electricity that can be used to power homes and businesses.

Is nuclear electricity safer than other forms of electricity?

Nuclear electricity is generally considered to be safe, as modern power plants have implemented strict safety measures and regulations. However, there is always a risk of accidents or natural disasters that could potentially cause harm.

Can nuclear electricity be used for renewable energy?

No, nuclear power plants do not use renewable sources of energy such as wind or solar. They rely on uranium, a non-renewable resource, for fuel. However, nuclear power is considered a low-carbon energy source as it does not produce greenhouse gas emissions.

Are there any environmental concerns associated with nuclear electricity separators?

While nuclear power plants do not emit greenhouse gases, there are concerns about the disposal of nuclear waste and the potential for accidents or leaks. Proper waste management and safety protocols are crucial in mitigating these concerns.

Similar threads

Project Orion Revisited: Is Nuclear Propulsion the Future of Space Travel?
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Nuclear power plant vs coal power plant efficiency
Replies
32
Views
2K
Exploring the Possibility of 100% Renewable Grid w/ Super Power
Replies
8
Views
1K
Do personal PV panels make sense considering the grid "cleanliness"?
Replies
14
Views
1K
Engineering Career advice for a nuclear engineering graduate
Replies
2
Views
3K
NASA NASA - Bimodal NTP/NEP with a Wave Rotor Topping Cycle
Replies
1
Views
3K
Nuclear weapons, FOIA, general public, and "need to know"
Replies
14
Views
2K
Fukushima or BWR expert opinion needed
Replies
10
Views
2K
"Storing" energy when it is not being used?
Replies
27
Views
3K
Nuclear fusion power plants - why is it taking so long to make them?
Replies
25
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top