I Null energy condition constrains the metric

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric Riemann
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Another GR question... in the thick of revision season. I would appreciate a sketch of how to approach the problem.

You basically are given a metric, involving a positive function ##A(z)##, $$g = A(z)^2(-dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2) + dz^2$$The game is to figure out somehow that the null-energy condition is satisfied if$$\frac{d^2}{dz^2} \log A(z) \leq 0$$I obtained the Riemann components using the tetrad formalism with the basis ##(A dt, A dx, A dy, dz)##. You get non-zero connection 1-forms ##{\omega^0}_3 = A^{-1} A' e^0##, then ##{\omega^1}_3 = A^{-1} A' e^1## and ##{\omega^2}_3 = A^{-1} A' e^2##. You then get the curvature 2-forms from ##{\Theta^{\mu}}_{\nu} = {d\omega^{\mu}}_{\nu} + {\omega^{\mu}}_{\rho} \wedge {\omega^{\rho}}_{\nu}##, and I read off the Riemann components via ##{\Theta^{\mu}}_{\nu} = \tfrac{1}{2} {R^{\mu}}_{\nu \rho \sigma} e^{\rho} \wedge e^{\sigma}## as:\begin{align*}
{R^{0}}_{303} &= {R^{1}}_{313} = {R^{2}}_{323} = \frac{A''}{A} \\
{R^{0}}_{202} &= {R^{0}}_{101} = {R^{1}}_{212} = - \left( \frac{A'}{A} \right)^2
\end{align*}
OK... so assuming these are correct, you need to figure out how to ensure that ##T_{ab} k^a k^b \geq 0## for any null vector ##k##. In principle you can use these components to construct the energy-momentum tensor in the tetrad basis via ##T_{\mu \nu} = (8\pi)^{-1} (R_{\mu \nu} - \tfrac{1}{2} R \eta_{\mu \nu})##, but this will take a bit more work.

Then, due to symmetry in x-y, I can rotate the x-y components of the null vector so that it takes the components ##k^{\mu} = (k^0, k^1, 0, k^3)## again in the tetrad basis, and there is the null constraint ##\eta_{\mu \nu} k^{\mu} k^{\nu} = -(k^0)^2 + (k^1)^2 + (k^3)^2 = 0## that I can use to consider only two independent components.

Is the way forward to go ahead with computing all of the matrix elements ##T_{\mu \nu}##, and then forming a system of equations? It seems like there must be a better approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
the null constraint ##\eta_{\mu \nu} k^{\mu} k^{\nu} = -(k^0)^2 + (k^1)^2 + (k^3)^2 = 0##
No, the null constraint is ##g_{\mu \nu} k^\mu k^\nu = 0##, which means ##- A^2 (k^0)^2 + A^2 (k^1)^2 + (k^3)^2 = 0##.

ergospherical said:
Is the way forward to go ahead with computing all of the matrix elements ##T_{\mu \nu}##, and then forming a system of equations?
Maxima should be able to crank out the Einstein tensor of the metric. I would expect you will find that it does not have many nonzero components, which will simplify things.
 
PeterDonis said:
No, the null constraint is ##g_{\mu \nu} k^\mu k^\nu = 0##, which means ##- A^2 (k^0)^2 + A^2 (k^1)^2 + (k^3)^2 = 0##.
The ##k^{\mu}## are here in the tetrad basis, so we use the Lorentz metric ##\eta##.
 
ergospherical said:
The ##k^{\mu}## are here in the tetrad basis, so we use the Lorentz metric ##\eta##.
So that means the factors of ##A## appear in the components. They have to appear somewhere.
 
Well, indeed, but I did specify that I'm working entirely in the tetrad basis. (This choice obviously simplifies things because I already have the Riemann components in the tetrad basis).
 
ergospherical said:
\begin{align*}
{R^{0}}_{303} &= {R^{1}}_{313} = {R^{2}}_{323} = \frac{A''}{A} \\
{R^{0}}_{202} &= {R^{0}}_{101} = {R^{1}}_{212} = - \left( \frac{A'}{A} \right)^2
\end{align*}
These look a lot like the terms you get when you expand out ##d^2 / dz^2 ( \log A(z) )##. That should be helpful.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
976
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Back
Top