- #1
DougFisica
- 2
- 0
- TL;DR Summary
- Analogy between 3 polarizers experiment and Stern-Gerlach experiment
Observables on the "3 polarizers experiment"
Hi guys,
I was analyzing the 3 polarizers experiment. This one: (first 2 minutes -> )
Doing the math (https://faculty.csbsju.edu/frioux/polarize/POLAR-sup.pdf) I realized that the process is similar to the Stern-Gerlach' experiment.
Using spins for the Stern Gerlach experiment: if you prepare a spin up (Z component) sample (first filter), and pass it to a second filter that measure the X component of the spin. You lose information about the Z component.
I undertand that Z and X component are non-commuting observables.
My question is:
Is there there an analogy for the polarizers experiment?
For example, if I measure the vertical component (first polarizer), I cannot get information about the 45º component (second polarizer).
I would guess the answer is Yes, however I cannot understand the "45º component" physical meaning.
Hi guys,
I was analyzing the 3 polarizers experiment. This one: (first 2 minutes -> )
Doing the math (https://faculty.csbsju.edu/frioux/polarize/POLAR-sup.pdf) I realized that the process is similar to the Stern-Gerlach' experiment.
Using spins for the Stern Gerlach experiment: if you prepare a spin up (Z component) sample (first filter), and pass it to a second filter that measure the X component of the spin. You lose information about the Z component.
I undertand that Z and X component are non-commuting observables.
My question is:
Is there there an analogy for the polarizers experiment?
For example, if I measure the vertical component (first polarizer), I cannot get information about the 45º component (second polarizer).
I would guess the answer is Yes, however I cannot understand the "45º component" physical meaning.