B Older student going back to basics

AI Thread Summary
Improving general math skills involves revisiting foundational concepts, particularly the importance of BODMAS in operations. The discussion highlights the significance of parentheses in mathematical expressions, as they clarify the order of operations and prevent ambiguity. Squaring a negative number requires proper notation, such as using brackets to indicate that the negative sign is part of the base being squared. The conversation also touches on the interpretation of mathematical expressions, emphasizing the need for clarity in notation to avoid miscalculations. Overall, understanding these principles enhances comprehension and accuracy in mathematical problem-solving.
logicandtruth
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
General operations query
1730632565554.png

I am trying to imporove my general maths and revisting my pre-college text books. For the above example question, my answer was 4 which is not correct as it is -4. The only difference I can see in my working is the first operation 3a^2. Here I simply did 3 x -2^2 which is -12 but in the answer working in blue font it shows (-2)^2 in brackets. This of course changes the answer due to BODMAS as 3(-2)^2 is 12 as -2 x -2 = 4. But is it correct to simply inser a bracket when the question does not show one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I see your point is "what is ##a^2## where a=-2".
##a^2##=a x a = -2 x -2 = 4
Here "x-" is ambiguous : multiply or subtract ? So in multiplication we put minus number in bracket.
##a^2##=a x a = -2 x (-2) = 4
 
To phrase it another way, squaring a number means multiplying it by itself. By taking the minus outside the square, you've changed the meaning to "the square of the absolute value of the number, then multiplied by -1 if the original number was negative".

Another way to look at it is that ##a^2=(a)^2##. So therefore the square of ##-2## must be ##(-2)^2##.
 
Coming from a computer science background, I see this in a bit of a different light -- as a question about parsing. In the absence of BODMAS, the grammar of mathematics is ambiguous.

When we make the substitution for "a" with "-2", we are replacing a one character string with a two character string. If we want the new expression to parse the same way as the old expression, we need to arrange for the "-2" to be treated as a single element.

So we parenthesize the "-2". The grammar of mathematics treats parenthesized sub-expressions as separate entities, so our goal is achieved.

But yes, the simple answer is that ##a = (a)## is a valid rule of mathematical expression evaluation.
 
Thank you all very much for your responses. It is now much more clearer and I now understand the treatment of the operation with the parenthesis.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
990
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top