One Dimensional Collision dealing with Reference Frames

In summary: V, you completely cleared it up for me. I was heading in that direction except I was strictly thinking of velocity and not taking into account mass. so I kept trying to figure a way to make each ball appear like it was moving 0 m/s. obviously 12 m/s right only works for the 20g ball and 0 m/s only works for the 40g ball. MASS! DUH! thanks a lot!EricV, that's the best I can do. It's word for word from the book so...
  • #1
JimiJams
53
0

Homework Statement



A 20g ball of clay is shot to the right at 12m/s toward a 40g ball of clay at rest. The two balls of clay collide and stick together. Call this reference frame S.


Homework Equations



What is the velocity of a reference frame S' in which the total momentum is zero?

The Attempt at a Solution



How I interpreted this is I calculated what velocity the 40 g ball would need to move for total momentum to equal zero. I came up with (.02kg)(12m/s)+(.04kg)(-6m/s)=0

Having found its velocity to be -6 m/s to satisfy a total momentum of zero I figured a reference frame moving 3 m/s would make the 20 g ball appear like it was traveling at 9 m/s and the 40 g ball at -9 m/s.

But this still doesn't sit right with me. I don't know why I went through the trouble of making their velocities appear equal but opposite, it seems unnecessary.

So my other though is maybe they mean the total momentum of the reference frame should be zero in which case the reference frame would simply have a velocity of 0 m/s.

Do either of these sound right? The wording of the question seems to complicate things.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi JimiJams! :smile:
JimiJams said:
How I interpreted this is I calculated what velocity the 40 g ball would need to move for total momentum to equal zero. I came up with (.02kg)(12m/s)+(.04kg)(-6m/s)=0

Having found its velocity to be -6 m/s to satisfy a total momentum of zero I figured a reference frame moving 3 m/s would make the 20 g ball appear like it was traveling at 9 m/s and the 40 g ball at -9 m/s.

hmm …

let's start again:

describe in english what the collision would look like in in frame S'
 
  • #3
In my opinion, what the question is asking you is:

To the reference frame that is watching the two balls collide, what must be its speed such that the total momentum of the collision is 0.

So the speeds of the two balls of clay need to be subtracted by some speed (which would be the speed of S') so that their new speed is in the reference frame of the observer.

My equation looks something like (m1)(12-x)+(m2)(0-x)=0, where x is the speed of the observer.

By solving this you'll get a number which will satisfy the equation when you plug in the new speeds of the to objects relative to the observer.
 
  • #4
Tiny Tim, that's the best I can do. It's word for word from the book so...

EricV, you completely cleared it up for me. I was heading in that direction except I was strictly thinking of velocity and not taking into account mass. So I kept trying to figure a way to make each ball appear like it was moving 0 m/s. obviously 12 m/s right only works for the 20g ball and 0 m/s only works for the 40g ball. MASS! DUH! Thanks a lot!
 
  • #5
JimiJams said:
Tiny Tim, that's the best I can do. It's word for word from the book so...

Yes, I know, but the book describes it in one frame, and it often helps to describe it in the other frame …

what would the collision look like in in frame S' ? :wink:
 
  • #6
JimiJams,

You're welcome. However, be sure to follow tiny-tim's advice as well next time. The very first thing I did when I read the problem was I visualized it from the perspective of the S' observer, and after that the answer came quickly.

Eric
 

FAQ: One Dimensional Collision dealing with Reference Frames

What is a one-dimensional collision?

A one-dimensional collision is a type of collision that occurs between two objects where their motion is constrained to a single straight line. This means that the objects can only move forwards or backwards along the same path.

2. How do reference frames affect one-dimensional collisions?

Reference frames are important in understanding one-dimensional collisions because they help us determine the relative motion of the objects involved. The choice of reference frame can affect how we perceive the collision and the resulting velocities of the objects.

3. Can two objects in a one-dimensional collision have the same final velocity?

Yes, it is possible for two objects in a one-dimensional collision to have the same final velocity. This can occur if the two objects have the same mass and collide head-on with equal but opposite velocities.

4. How do you calculate the final velocities of two objects in a one-dimensional collision?

The final velocities of two objects in a one-dimensional collision can be calculated using the conservation of momentum and the conservation of kinetic energy equations. These equations take into account the masses and initial velocities of the objects, as well as the type of collision (elastic or inelastic).

5. What is the difference between an elastic and an inelastic one-dimensional collision?

An elastic collision is one where the total kinetic energy of the system is conserved, meaning that the objects involved bounce off each other without any loss of energy. In an inelastic collision, some kinetic energy is lost, usually in the form of heat or sound, resulting in the objects sticking together after the collision.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
800
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
6K

Back
Top