Operators On Multivariable Wave Functions

  • #1
flyusx
36
0
Homework Statement
Are ##\hat{A}=\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}## and ##\hat{B}=\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}## Hermitian? Given ##\psi(\theta,\phi)=\exp(-3i\phi)\cos(\theta)##, evaluate <ψ|Α|ψ>, <ψ|Β|ψ>
Relevant Equations
Hermitian functions can act either on the bra or ket first; non-Hermitian functions do not have tis ability. <φ|ψ>##=\int\phi^{*}\psi##
I know the way to solve the first part is to find <ψ|Αψ> and compare it with <ψΑ|ψ>. This comparison can be done through an integral representation where we take ψ* and act A on ψ to be the integrand, or act A on ψ* and multiply by ψ for the integrand. If the integrals are the same, then the operator is Hermitian. (Another way is to check the eigenvalues and see if they are purely real). My question is: after computing the integrand, do we expand the integral out as a double integral with respect to dφdθ? Or do we only expand it in terms of dθ since the exponential term cancels out? I assume the bounds for the integral will be from 0 to 2π as this would represent a full 'declination and ascension' over space. Knowing this will help me solve both parts.

If it's of any use, this is Exercise 2.52 of Zettili's Quantum Mechanics. I referred to his solved Problem 2.19 to see the best way to represent an inner product, but the wave functions there were solely dependent on x and thus integrated with respect to dx. I couldn't find an example where an inner product of a multivariable wave function was expanded out in integral form.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
My guess is that you have to work in both ##\theta## and ##\phi##, and integrate with the proper integration element, ##\sin \theta \, d\theta \, d \phi##.
 
  • #3
I thought $$\langleψ(x)|\hat{A}|ψ(x)\rangle$$ meant $$\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx$$, and ended up figuring out that one does integrate over all elements (for instance, x,y,z or in this case θ,φ). I know that in spherical coordinates, volume integration isn't simply dρdθdφ, but I thought that an expectation value calculation was defined to be ##\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx## over all space.

Either way, I've linked a photo of my solution. The integral was evaluated from 0 to 2π.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    15.6 KB · Views: 29
Last edited:
  • #4
flyusx said:
I thought $$\langleψ(x)|\hat{A}|ψ(x)\rangle$$ meant $$\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx$$,
##\ket{\psi(x)}## doesn't make sense. ##\ket{\psi}## is an (abstract) vector in Hilbert space, so it doesn't make sense to write it as having a position dependence. To convert to a wave function, you have
$$
\psi(x) = \braket{x | \psi}
$$

flyusx said:
but I thought that an expectation value calculation was defined to be ##\int\psi^{*}\hat{A}\psi\;dx## over all space.
If you have, for example, a particle on a ring, "all space" means "anywhere on the ring", which can be parametrized by a single angle ##\theta##.


flyusx said:
Either way, I've linked a photo of my solution. The integral was evaluated from 0 to 2π.
I don't see the ##\sin \theta## in the integration element. Also, you are not showing anything here about hermiticity.
 
  • #5
A is anti-Hermitian, B is Hermitian. I'd figured that part by myself so I didn't bother to link it. Sorry.

Does ##\sin(θ)## come from spherical integration? I've seen ##ρ^2\sin(θ)## for a volume integral but I can't conceptualise where the sine comes from.
 
  • #7
Thanks, I checked out the section/page about solid angle. But <ψ|Α|ψ> would be zero as $$\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\sin(\theta)\cos^{2}(\theta)\;d\theta d\phi=0$$. <ψ|Β|ψ> would also remain zero. Is this reasonable, or are my integral bounds wrong?
 
  • #8
flyusx said:
are my integral bounds wrong?
The polar angle ##\theta## runs from ##0## to ##\pi##.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
  • #9
Yes, I am blind. Thank you.
 

FAQ: Operators On Multivariable Wave Functions

What are operators in the context of multivariable wave functions?

Operators in the context of multivariable wave functions are mathematical entities that act on wave functions to extract physical information about a quantum system. These operators can represent observable quantities such as momentum, position, and energy. When applied to a wave function, they yield eigenvalues that correspond to measurable properties of the system.

How do you apply differential operators to multivariable wave functions?

To apply differential operators to multivariable wave functions, you use partial derivatives with respect to each variable. For example, the momentum operator in the x-direction is represented as -iħ∂/∂x. When this operator acts on a wave function ψ(x, y, z), you take the partial derivative of ψ with respect to x. Similarly, other differential operators are applied by taking the appropriate partial derivatives with respect to their corresponding variables.

What is the significance of the Laplacian operator in multivariable wave functions?

The Laplacian operator, denoted as ∇², is significant in multivariable wave functions because it appears in the Schrödinger equation, which governs the behavior of quantum systems. The Laplacian is a second-order differential operator that involves the sum of the second partial derivatives with respect to all spatial coordinates. It plays a crucial role in describing how the wave function evolves in space and time.

How are Hermitian operators related to observable quantities in quantum mechanics?

Hermitian operators are fundamental in quantum mechanics because they correspond to observable quantities. An operator is Hermitian if it equals its own conjugate transpose, ensuring that its eigenvalues are real. This property is essential because observable quantities, such as energy and momentum, must have real values. When a Hermitian operator acts on a wave function, the resulting eigenvalues represent measurable physical properties.

Can you explain the commutation relations between operators in multivariable systems?

Commutation relations between operators in multivariable systems describe how pairs of operators interact when applied in sequence. Two operators A and B commute if their commutator [A, B] = AB - BA equals zero. Non-commuting operators indicate that the order of application affects the outcome, which has implications for the uncertainty principle. For example, the position and momentum operators do not commute, leading to the fundamental uncertainty relationship in quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top