- #1
Hydr0matic
- 197
- 1
What is your opinion on this hypothesis ?
http://www.wincom.net/earthexp/n/navback.htm
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/nav.html
http://www.expanding-earth.org/
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2730/
http://www.es.usyd.edu.au/geology/people/staff/dietmar/Agegrid/Images/crustageposter.gif
I first came across this hypothesis when I was studdying the digital agegrid of the ocean floor. But knowing what I know, I dismissed it immediately. It wasn't until yesterday I realized I wasn't the only one to have reached this conclusion.
If I were to have a completely openminded position on this and just focus on the geological data, I'd definitely think expansion was a more likely explanation.
But the implications of this hypothesis being correct is so absurd, I dare not consider it a serious alternative.
http://www.wincom.net/earthexp/n/navback.htm
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/nav.html
http://www.expanding-earth.org/
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2730/
http://www.es.usyd.edu.au/geology/people/staff/dietmar/Agegrid/Images/crustageposter.gif
I first came across this hypothesis when I was studdying the digital agegrid of the ocean floor. But knowing what I know, I dismissed it immediately. It wasn't until yesterday I realized I wasn't the only one to have reached this conclusion.
If I were to have a completely openminded position on this and just focus on the geological data, I'd definitely think expansion was a more likely explanation.
But the implications of this hypothesis being correct is so absurd, I dare not consider it a serious alternative.
Last edited by a moderator: