Optimizing Forces in Towing: Minimizing FB for a Given Resultant Force

In summary: The magnitude of FB is minimized when the angle between FA and FB is 90 degrees, meaning that they are perpendicular. This is because the sum of the forces will be the greatest when the angles are in opposite directions, and the magnitude of FB will be the smallest when it is perpendicular to FA.
  • #36
newbphysic said:
For FB perpendicular FA,is there an explanation for this ? why it works ?
It's easy to see geometrically.
Draw the 950N as a line OP with a length representing its magnitude, and a line for the direction of FA from the same origin.
The magnitude of FA will be indicated by a point on its line, Q say.
FB will be represented by a vector from Q to P. What position of Q minimises the length PQ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
newbphysic said:
For FB perpendicular FA,is there an explanation for this ? why it works ? and why not perpendicular to FR ?

Sorry if i ask a lot of questions :)
It IS the explanation. ##\vec F_R ## is the sum of the vectors ##\vec F_A ## and ##\vec F_B ##. We expressed their components with the magnitudes FA, FB and angles, a, q. Solved the system of equations for FB. It must be minimum, so its derivative with respect to q has to be zero. From that, we got the equation ##\frac{1}{\tan(a)}-\tan(q)=0##, that is, the tangent of the angle q is equal the reciprocal of the tangent of the other angle. Now, remember how the tangent was defined in a right triangle,
upload_2016-3-12_6-15-50.png

##tan(\alpha)=a/b## and ##tan(\beta)=b/a##, the tangents of the two angles are reciprocal to each others in a right triangle. But the sum of the two angles is 90°as the sum of all angles in a triangle makes 180°, one angle is 90° , so ##\alpha + \beta = 90°##. Any time when the tangents of two acute angles are reciprocal, their sum is 90°.
Here, the two forces ##\vec F_A ## and ##\vec F_A ## enclose the angle a+q, and the tangents of the angles are reciprocal to each other, so a+q=90°, the forces are perpendicular to each other.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-3-12_6-16-36.png
    upload_2016-3-12_6-16-36.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 373
  • #38
haruspex said:
It's easy to see geometrically.
Draw the 950N as a line OP with a length representing its magnitude, and a line for the direction of FA from the same origin.
The magnitude of FA will be indicated by a point on its line, Q say.
FB will be represented by a vector from Q to P. What position of Q minimises the length PQ?
when it's perpendicular to FR ? the red line is the right answer according to calculation
:oldconfused:
YNdj7BL.png

ehild said:
##tan(\alpha)=a/b## and ##tan(\beta)=b/a##, the tangents of the two angles are reciprocal to each others in a right triangle. But the sum of the two angles is 90°as the sum of all angles in a triangle makes 180°, one angle is 90° , so ##\alpha + \beta = 90°##. Any time when the tangents of two acute angles are reciprocal, their sum is 90°.
Here, the two forces ##\vec F_A ## and ##\vec F_A ## enclose the angle a+q, and the tangents of the angles are reciprocal to each other, so a+q=90°, the forces are perpendicular to each other.

OK :wink: but what i still don't understand is this, how can you know it must be perpendicular to FA not to FR. Here is another example that looks exactly like before but in this example Fb perpendicular Fr. Why it's different ?
6d2OKP7.png
C8Yu2Mf.png


I tried to use the your method and i find theta = 60 degrees
 
  • #39
newbphysic said:
OK :wink: but what i still don't understand is this, how can you know it must be perpendicular to FA not to FR. Here is another example that looks exactly like before but in this example Fb perpendicular Fr. Why it's different ?
6d2OKP7.png
C8Yu2Mf.png


I tried to use the your method and i find theta = 60 degrees
This is an other problem. Here Fa is given, FR has to be determined, so as its direction is the positive x axis. In the previous problem, FR was given and Fa was unknown.
From the equation Fa sin(30)=Fbsin(θ) ---> 2*1/2 = Fbsin(θ), you get that Fb=1/sin(θ), which is minimum if sin(θ)=1, that is, θ=90°.
 
  • #40
ehild said:
This is an other problem. Here Fa is given, FR has to be determined, so as its direction is the positive x axis. In the previous problem, FR was given and Fa was unknown.
From the equation Fa sin(30)=Fbsin(θ) ---> 2*1/2 = Fbsin(θ), you get that Fb=1/sin(θ), which is minimum if sin(θ)=1, that is, θ=90°.
I'm really confused :bugeye:

Why for the first problem i can't solve it like this one (without substituting FA)
FA sin(20) -FB sin(q) = 0
FB =FAsin(20)/sin(q)

I know that we don't know FA but we know in order for FB to be minimum sin(q) must equal 1 (the biggest value) but the result will not be 70
 
Last edited:
  • #41
newbphysic said:
when it's perpendicular to FR ? the red line is the right answer according to calculation
:oldconfused:
YNdj7BL.png
Neither line minimises the distance PQ, keeping P fixed and varying Q. (Or is P supposed to be where the red line meets the baseline?)
 
  • #42
haruspex said:
Neither line minimises the distance PQ, keeping P fixed and varying Q. (Or is P supposed to be where the red line meets the baseline?)
yimS4uH.png
P is fixed but Q vary.

Ooh i see so is this mean in order to find minimum value the unknown must perpendicular to each other ?
 
  • #43
newbphysic said:
yimS4uH.png
P is fixed but Q vary.

Ooh i see so is this mean in order to find minimum value the unknown must perpendicular to each other ?
If one has a fixed direction and you are trying to minimise the other, yes.
(I assume Q in the diagram is where the blue line meets the sloping black line.)
 
  • Like
Likes newbphysic
  • #44
newbphysic said:
I'm really confused :bugeye:

Why for the first problem i can't solve it like this one (without substituting FA)
FA sin(20) -FB sin(q) = 0
FB =FAsin(20)/sin(q)

I know that we don't know FA but we know in order for FB to be minimum sin(q) must equal 1 (the biggest value) but the result will not be 70
In the first problem, FR was given, you knew the point P and you had to draw a line to the line of FA, which length was the shortest. It is the normal from P to the line FA. That line segment corresponded to FB, and the red line segment corresponded to FA.
In the second problem, FA was given, you knew the point Q. You have to draw the shortest line from it to the line of FR. It is perpendicular to FR.
You know, that the shortest distance from a point to a straight line is the perpendicular to the given line.
upload_2016-3-12_13-10-28.png


If you drew a line perpendicular from P, its length would be longer than the real FB.
upload_2016-3-12_13-22-44.png
 
  • #45
haruspex said:
If one has a fixed direction and you are trying to minimise the other, yes.
(I assume Q in the diagram is where the blue line meets the sloping black line.)

ehild said:
In the first problem, FR was given, you knew the point P and you had to draw a line to the line of FA, which length was the shortest. It is the normal from P to the line FA. That line segment corresponded to FB, and the red line segment corresponded to FA.
In the second problem, FA was given, you knew the point Q. You have to draw the shortest line from it to the line of FR. It is perpendicular to FR.
You know, that the shortest distance from a point to a straight line is the perpendicular to the given line.
View attachment 97245

If you drew a line perpendicular from P, its length would be longer than the real FB.
View attachment 97246
Thank you for your help
:bow:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top