- #1
ilia1987
- 9
- 0
I have the following problem:
I have a set of [tex]m[/tex] measurements [tex]$\mathbf{\phi}$[/tex]
and I estimate a set of 3 variables [tex]$\mathbf{x}$[/tex]
The estimated value for [tex]$\mathbf{\phi}$[/tex] depends linearly on [tex]$\mathbf{x}$[/tex] : [tex]Hx=\Tilde{\phi}[/tex]
The solution through weighted linear least squares is:
[tex]$\mathbf{x}$ = (H^TWH)^{-1}H^TW$\mathbf{\phi}$[/tex]
W is diagonal matrix
Suppose there is absolutely no deviation between the estimated values of [tex]$\mathbf{\phi}$[/tex] and the measured values (perfect measurements).
Now, suppose that one measurement [tex]\phi_i[/tex] deviates strongly from its nominal value. In such a case the estimated value of [tex]$\mathbf{x}$[/tex] is going to change and so will the estimated value [tex]$\mathbf{\Tilde{\phi}}$[/tex]. if the actual measurements deviate by [tex]$\mathbf{\delta\phi}$[/tex], the estimated values are goind to deviate by:
[tex]$\mathbf{\Delta\Tilde{\phi}}=H (H^TWH)^{-1}H^TW$\mathbf{\delta\phi}$[/tex]
I later use the difference [tex]\Tilde{\phi}-\phi[/tex] to reject stray measurements.
So, a situation where one stray measurement [tex]\delta\phi_i[/tex] causes a large deviation [tex]\Delta\Tilde{\phi_j}[/tex] is undesirable.
I reached the conclusion that it is necessary for off diagonal elements of
[tex]H (H^TWH)^{-1}H^TW[/tex] to be smaller than the diagonal elements in order for the correct measurement to be recognized as stray.
My hope is that someone on this forum can help me find a nicer, more analytical way to express that condition on [tex]H[/tex] itself rather that on this monstrous expression, or at least point me in the right direction.
Thank you.
I have a set of [tex]m[/tex] measurements [tex]$\mathbf{\phi}$[/tex]
and I estimate a set of 3 variables [tex]$\mathbf{x}$[/tex]
The estimated value for [tex]$\mathbf{\phi}$[/tex] depends linearly on [tex]$\mathbf{x}$[/tex] : [tex]Hx=\Tilde{\phi}[/tex]
The solution through weighted linear least squares is:
[tex]$\mathbf{x}$ = (H^TWH)^{-1}H^TW$\mathbf{\phi}$[/tex]
W is diagonal matrix
Suppose there is absolutely no deviation between the estimated values of [tex]$\mathbf{\phi}$[/tex] and the measured values (perfect measurements).
Now, suppose that one measurement [tex]\phi_i[/tex] deviates strongly from its nominal value. In such a case the estimated value of [tex]$\mathbf{x}$[/tex] is going to change and so will the estimated value [tex]$\mathbf{\Tilde{\phi}}$[/tex]. if the actual measurements deviate by [tex]$\mathbf{\delta\phi}$[/tex], the estimated values are goind to deviate by:
[tex]$\mathbf{\Delta\Tilde{\phi}}=H (H^TWH)^{-1}H^TW$\mathbf{\delta\phi}$[/tex]
I later use the difference [tex]\Tilde{\phi}-\phi[/tex] to reject stray measurements.
So, a situation where one stray measurement [tex]\delta\phi_i[/tex] causes a large deviation [tex]\Delta\Tilde{\phi_j}[/tex] is undesirable.
I reached the conclusion that it is necessary for off diagonal elements of
[tex]H (H^TWH)^{-1}H^TW[/tex] to be smaller than the diagonal elements in order for the correct measurement to be recognized as stray.
My hope is that someone on this forum can help me find a nicer, more analytical way to express that condition on [tex]H[/tex] itself rather that on this monstrous expression, or at least point me in the right direction.
Thank you.
Last edited: