Orthogonality, Fourier series and Kronecker delta

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating the orthogonality relation for cosine basis functions in Fourier series, specifically showing the integral of the product of two cosine functions leads to a form involving the sine function. Participants are trying to understand how to apply trigonometric identities, particularly the product-to-sum rules, to simplify the integral. Additionally, there is a query about deriving the Fourier series for a square wave function, with hints about the Gibbs phenomenon and the role of sine functions. The conversation also touches on solving a heat equation related to a semi-infinite bar, with participants discussing separation of variables and the necessary steps to find the solution. Overall, the thread emphasizes the application of Fourier series and trigonometric identities in solving related mathematical problems.
TobyDarkeness
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the orthogonality relation for the "cosine basis functions" used in the Fourier series is

1/L\intcos[(n*pi*x)/L)]cos[(m*pi*x)/L)]dx = {Sin([n-m]*pi)}/[(n-m)*pi] + {Sin([n+m]*pi)}/[(n+m)*pi]

By considering the different integer n and m, show that the right hand side is equal to \delta(nm)

Homework Equations



the limits of integration are -L to L

The Attempt at a Solution


we haven't been taught how to handle this type of integral i know what the solution looks like but i don't know the process to get there. Our task is to find out. Could anyone help me? thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ah i see so i should use, 1/2{cos[(n*pi*x)-(m*pi*x)]+cos[(m*pi*x)+(n*pi*x)]} substitute that into my integral and proceed with the integration and Fourier series?
 
TobyDarkeness said:
ah i see so i should use, 1/2{cos[(n*pi*x)-(m*pi*x)]+cos[(m*pi*x)+(n*pi*x)]} substitute that into my integral and proceed with the integration and Fourier series?

Sure. I hope you haven't been waiting for my reply to proceed.
 
Oh no, I was just checking I was heading in the correct direction thanks for the help haven't quite finished but it's coming together. A further question,

Show that the Fourier series for the square wave defined as
f(x)=-1 for -L<=x<=0
f(x)= 1 for 0<=x<=L
is given by the following equation:
f(x)=\sum m=1 to infinity of [2/(m*pi)]*[1-(-1)^m)sin[(m*pi*x)/L]

i know this is something to do with the gibs function and (-1)^m is a cos function but i have no idea how to get here. Thanks again.
 
TobyDarkeness said:
Oh no, I was just checking I was heading in the correct direction thanks for the help haven't quite finished but it's coming together. A further question,

Show that the Fourier series for the square wave defined as
f(x)=-1 for -L<=x<=0
f(x)= 1 for 0<=x<=L
is given by the following equation:
f(x)=\sum m=1 to infinity of [2/(m*pi)]*[1-(-1)^m)sin[(m*pi*x)/L]

i know this is something to do with the gibs function and (-1)^m is a cos function but i have no idea how to get here. Thanks again.

You integrate f(x) times the sin function from -L to L to get the coefficient. Just break it into the two integrals from -L to 0 (where f(x)=(-1)) and 0 to L (where f(x)=1).
 
thanks again for the help, they worked out pretty well. just another quick question if you can help.

[6] A semi-infinite bar 0 < x < ∞ is subject to periodic heating at x = 0 ; the
temperature at x = 0 is T0 cosωt and is zero at x = ∞. By solving the heat equation

∂T/∂t= 1/2(∂2T/∂x2) ,
show that

T (x,t) = T_0 exp(α x)cos(ωt − x sqrtω ),
where α is a constant to be determined.

Ok I know I need to separate variables and Iv'e been advised to solve for the time dependence first. This is what Iv'e done so far but I'm a little stuck for the next steps.

∂T/∂t= 1/2*(∂^2T/∂x^2)

T(x,t)=X(x)T(t)

∂/∂t*[X(x)T(t)]=1/2*[(∂^2)/(∂x^2)]*(X(x)T(t))

X(x)*[∂T(t)/∂t]=1/2*T(t)*[∂^2X(x)]/[∂x^2]

dividing through by 1/[X(x)T(t)]


1/[T(t)]*[∂T(t)/∂t]=1/2*[1/X(x)]*(∂^2 X(x))/∂x^2


2/T(t)*∂T(t)/∂t=1/X(x)*[(∂^2X(x))/(∂x^2)]


T(x,t) =T_0exp(αx)cos(ωt − x sqrtω)

T(0,t)=T_0cos(ωt)

T(infinity,0)=0

this is what i have not sure where to go next...

thanks again.
 
ok i think i have to make the constants complex but I'm not sure what I should sub in.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K