I Outright understanding L/R inductor time constant

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of an LR circuit when an external voltage is applied. It highlights that while a higher voltage increases the current more rapidly, it also results in a larger final current, leading to a balance that keeps the time constant independent of the voltage. The time constant, determined by the resistance (R) and inductance (L), indicates that a greater resistance results in a shorter charging time for the inductor. This relationship is supported by differential equations that describe the system's dynamics. Ultimately, the time required for the inductor to charge is influenced by resistance rather than the applied voltage.
abdulbadii
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Scientifically understanding L/R inductor time constant r reciprocates it
How is the real understanding, when an external constant E potential (voltage) is imposed/applied on a LR circuit, that is being charged as the characteristic L/R inductor time constant: the greater R the shorter time inductor get (full) charged

This absolutely independent to the E; it could simply be so great while time constant (charge time) still being shorter time than that of far less E, as proven or inspected by the (DE) equation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abdulbadii said:
Summary: Scientifically understanding L/R inductor time constant r reciprocates it

as proven or inspected by the (DE) equation
yes.
 
A larger voltage means that the current increases faster, but it also means that the final current is larger. The two effects balance out so the time required is independent of the voltage.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...

Similar threads

Back
Top