Paramentric eq. of tangent line

Click For Summary
To find the equation of the tangent line to the function f(t) = <cot(t), csc(t)> at the point (1/sqrt(3), 2/sqrt(3)), the slope must be calculated using the derivative, which is given as csc(t)cot(t)/csc^2(t). The correct approach involves using the point-slope form of the line equation, y - y0 = m(x - x0), rather than the standard form. It's essential to determine the value of t that corresponds to the given point to accurately compute the slope and subsequently the tangent line equation. After deriving the vector equation, substituting the appropriate t value will yield the necessary calculations to finalize the tangent line equation. Understanding these steps is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Calcgeek123
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the equation of the tangent line to f(t)=<cot(t),csc(t)> at the point (1/sq.rt of 3, 2/sq.rt of 3)


Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution


I started by finding the slope, y'/x', so I got csc(t)cot(t)/csc^2(t). I then used the equation of a line, y=mx+b. Doesn't a tangent line have the opposite slope? So I think i'd plug in 2/sq.rt of 3 for y, csc^2(t)/csc(t)cot(t) for the slope, 1/sq.rt of 3 for x, and then solve for b. Do I need to plug in my x and y points though into the slope? Then that gets tough because I don't know what csc^2(1/sq. rt of 3) is. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calcgeek123 said:

Homework Statement


Find the equation of the tangent line to f(t)=<cot(t),csc(t)> at the point (1/sq.rt of 3, 2/sq.rt of 3)


Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution


I started by finding the slope, y'/x', so I got csc(t)cot(t)/csc^2(t).

Any law against simplifying that?

I then used the equation of a line, y=mx+b.

Why use that form instead of the form y - y0 = m(x - x0)? After all, you are given a point on the curve through which the line must pass.
Doesn't a tangent line have the opposite slope?

Opposite? Isn't the slope of the tangent line defined to be the slope of the curve?

So I think i'd plug in 2/sq.rt of 3 for y, csc^2(t)/csc(t)cot(t) for the slope, 1/sq.rt of 3 for x, and then solve for b. Do I need to plug in my x and y points though into the slope? Then that gets tough because I don't know what csc^2(1/sq. rt of 3) is. Any suggestions?

Can't you figure out what t gives the point in question and just use it in your calculations?
 
I say you should try to figure out what value of t makes that point. Once you do that you can derive that vector equation, then with the derivative you can find the slope at any given point. With that slope you can find the equation of the line.
 
Thank you! I took the advice from the first post, and I've ended up with y-csc(t)=cos(t) (x-csc(t)). Now I'm just lost as to what to do with the point I've been given, (1/sq. rt of 3, 2/sq. rt of 3). I could plug in those numbers into the equation i arrived at for x and y, but then what would i solve for?
 
do what i said on my post after that, because if you have the derived vector equation, you need to plug in a t value
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
974
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K