- #1
dipole
- 555
- 151
Parition function for Boson "gas" with two quantum numbers
Let's say that we have a system of non-interacting Bosons with single-particle energies given by,
[itex] \epsilon_{p,m} = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \alpha m [/itex]
where [itex] m = -j, ... ,j [/itex]
and we want to calculate the partition function of this system. To do this, you would write,
[tex] Z_N = \sum_{\{n(\vec{p},m)\}} \exp(-\beta \sum_{\vec{p},m} \epsilon_{p,m}n(\vec{p},m)) [/tex]
Where [itex] n(\vec{p},m) [/itex] are the occupation numbers. From there, you would use the grand cannoncial formalism, and have that,
[tex] Q = \sum_{N=0} e^{\beta \mu N} \sum_{\{n(\vec{p},m)\}} \exp(-\beta \sum_{\vec{p},m} \epsilon_{p,m}n(\vec{p},m)) [/tex]
Assuming I haven't made any mistakes yet (and if I have PLEASE point them out!) I'm not sure how to evaluate this when there is double sums involved since, [itex] n(\vec{p},m) [/itex] can certainly be degenerate...
I'm thinking I can just write this as,
[tex] Q = \sum_ {\{n(\vec{p},m)\}} \prod_{\vec{p},m} \exp(-\beta(\epsilon_{p,m} - \mu )n(\vec{p},m)) [/tex]
and then proceed as normal, but I'm really not sure... any stat-wizards out there want to help me out?
Let's say that we have a system of non-interacting Bosons with single-particle energies given by,
[itex] \epsilon_{p,m} = \frac{p^2}{2m} + \alpha m [/itex]
where [itex] m = -j, ... ,j [/itex]
and we want to calculate the partition function of this system. To do this, you would write,
[tex] Z_N = \sum_{\{n(\vec{p},m)\}} \exp(-\beta \sum_{\vec{p},m} \epsilon_{p,m}n(\vec{p},m)) [/tex]
Where [itex] n(\vec{p},m) [/itex] are the occupation numbers. From there, you would use the grand cannoncial formalism, and have that,
[tex] Q = \sum_{N=0} e^{\beta \mu N} \sum_{\{n(\vec{p},m)\}} \exp(-\beta \sum_{\vec{p},m} \epsilon_{p,m}n(\vec{p},m)) [/tex]
Assuming I haven't made any mistakes yet (and if I have PLEASE point them out!) I'm not sure how to evaluate this when there is double sums involved since, [itex] n(\vec{p},m) [/itex] can certainly be degenerate...
I'm thinking I can just write this as,
[tex] Q = \sum_ {\{n(\vec{p},m)\}} \prod_{\vec{p},m} \exp(-\beta(\epsilon_{p,m} - \mu )n(\vec{p},m)) [/tex]
and then proceed as normal, but I'm really not sure... any stat-wizards out there want to help me out?