Parrot Guy's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a summation proof by induction

In summary, the conversation is about using mathematical induction to prove a statement involving a summation. The process involves checking the base case and using the induction hypothesis and step to derive the statement for any value of n.
  • #1
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
13,288
12
Here is the question:

Mathematical Induction Problem help?



Use Mathematical Induction to prove the following statement:

2 + 10 + 24 + 44 + . . . + n(3n - 1) = n^2(n+1)

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hello Parrot Guy,

We are given to prove:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^n\left(j(3j-1) \right)=n^2(n+1)\)

First, we check to see if the base case $P_1$ is true:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^1\left(j(3j-1) \right)=1^2(1+1)\)

\(\displaystyle 1(3\cdot1-1)=1(1+1)\)

\(\displaystyle 2=2\)

The base case is true, so next we state the induction hypothesis $P_k$:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^k\left(j(3j-1) \right)=k^2(k+1)\)

As our induction step, we may add \(\displaystyle (k+1)(3(k+1)-1)\) to both sides:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^k\left(j(3j-1) \right)+(k+1)(3(k+1)-1)=k^2(k+1)+(k+1)(3(k+1)-1)\)

On the left, incorporate the new term into the summation and on the right, factor and distribute:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^{k+1}\left(j(3j-1) \right)=(k+1)\left(k^2+3k+2 \right)\)

Factor further on the right:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^{k+1}\left(j(3j-1) \right)=(k+1)(k+1)(k+2)\)

Rewrite the right side:

\(\displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^{k+1}\left(j(3j-1) \right)=(k+1)^2((k+1)+1)\)

We have derived $P_{k+1}$ from $P_{k}$ thereby completing the proof by induction.
 

FAQ: Parrot Guy's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a summation proof by induction

What is a summation proof by induction?

A summation proof by induction is a mathematical method used to prove that a summation formula is true for all values of a variable. It involves using a base case and an inductive step to show that the formula holds for n+1 if it holds for n.

How is a summation proof by induction different from other proof methods?

A summation proof by induction is different from other proof methods because it specifically focuses on proving summation formulas. It uses a step-by-step approach, starting with a base case and then using an inductive step to prove the formula for all values of the variable.

Can you provide an example of a summation proof by induction?

Yes, for example, let's say we want to prove the formula for the sum of the first n natural numbers: 1+2+3+...+n = n(n+1)/2. The base case would be n=1, which is true because 1=1(1+1)/2. Then, for the inductive step, we assume the formula holds for n and use it to prove that it also holds for n+1. This can be done by substituting n+1 into the formula and simplifying the expression to show that it is equal to the sum of the first n+1 natural numbers.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when doing a summation proof by induction?

Some common mistakes to avoid when doing a summation proof by induction include forgetting to include a base case or using the wrong inductive step. It is also important to carefully simplify expressions and use algebraic rules correctly.

When is a summation proof by induction used in real-life situations?

A summation proof by induction is commonly used in fields such as computer science, engineering, and physics to prove the correctness of algorithms, equations, and formulas. It is also used in mathematical research to prove theorems and properties of summation formulas.

Back
Top