MHB Partial differential equations problem - finding the general solution

Another1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
$$4\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 3u$$ , $$u(x,0)=4e^{-x}-e^{-5x}$$

let $$ U =X(x)T(t) $$

so

$$4X\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}+T\frac{\partial X}{\partial x} = 3XT$$
$$4\frac{\partial T}{T \partial t}+\frac{\partial X}{X \partial x} = 3$$
$$\left( 4\frac{\partial T}{T \partial t}-3 \right) +\frac{\partial X}{X \partial x} = 0 $$

let K = constant
$$\frac{\partial X}{X \partial x} =\left( 3 - 4\frac{\partial T}{T \partial t} \right) = k $$
_________________________________________________________________________________

$$\frac{\partial X}{X \partial x} = k $$
$$\frac{d X}{X} = k dx$$
$$ X = C_1e^{kx}$$
_________________________________________________________________________________

$$\left( 3 - 4\frac{\partial T}{T \partial t} \right) = k $$
$$ 4\frac{\partial T}{T \partial t}= 3 - k $$
$$ \frac{\partial T}{T \partial t}= \frac{1}{4}(3 - k) $$
$$ \frac{d T}{T}= \frac{1}{4}(3 - k) dt $$
$$ T = C_2e^{\frac{1}{4}(3 - k) t} $$
_________________________________________________________________________________

general solution
$$ u(x,t) = C e^{kx}e^{\frac{1}{4}(3 - k) t} $$ then $$ C=C_1C_2 $$

$$ u(x,0) = C e^{kx} = 4e^{-x}-e^{-5x} $$ <<How do I solve this equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another said:
general solution
$$ u(x,t) = C e^{kx}e^{\frac{1}{4}(3 - k) t} $$ then $$ C=C_1C_2 $$

$$ u(x,0) = C e^{kx} = 4e^{-x}-e^{-5x} $$ <<How do I solve this equation?
You have shown that $$ u(x,t) = C e^{kx}e^{\frac{1}{4}(3 - k) t} $$ is a solution. But it is not the general solution. Instead, it provides a solution for every value of $k$. So a more general solution would be given by a sum of those solutions, for different values of $k$: \[ u(x,t) = \sum_k C_k e^{kx}e^{\frac{1}{4}(3 - k) t}.\] In particular, you could take the solutions for $k=-1$ and $k=-5$, and use their sum as a solution.
 
Opalg said:
You have shown that $$ u(x,t) = C e^{kx}e^{\frac{1}{4}(3 - k) t} $$ is a solution. But it is not the general solution. Instead, it provides a solution for every value of $k$. So a more general solution would be given by a sum of those solutions, for different values of $k$: \[ u(x,t) = \sum_k C_k e^{kx}e^{\frac{1}{4}(3 - k) t}.\] In particular, you could take the solutions for $k=-1$ and $k=-5$, and use their sum as a solution.

Great! thank you
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top