Particle in abox : continuous functions problem

In summary: But that's a pretty involved analysis, and I'm not surewhether it's the right approach in this particular case. Well, "infinite" without further explanation means "undefined". One needs to be more precise. E.g., you could take V to be a finite constant "C" for|x| > L/2 and solve the Schroedinger equation for that case, under the conditionsthat ψ is suitably continuous everywhere (meaning that ψ and its first derivativemust match at the L/2 boundaries). Then normalize the resulting wavefunction,and look at what happens as C \to \infty. But that's a pretty involved analysis, and I'm not sure
  • #1
g.prabhakar
4
0
I was studying particle in a box from shankar and I couldn't get the following point. If V is infinite at for x > L/2 and x < L/2, so is double derivative of psi. Now Shankar mentions that it follows the derivative of psi has a finite jump. I am not able to get this point because according to my understanding if a function f is such that
f ''(x) = k, a constant, x<=a
f ''(x) = infinite , x>a
then its integration (which comes out to be f '(x) ) from say x=0 to any point x>a (say x=2a) becomes infinite and therefore jump is infinite, (which is contradictory to what shankar mentions)
Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If V is infinite at for x > L/2 and x < L/2, so is double derivative of psi.
If Shankar said that, then he's the one who is wrong. If V is infinite, then ψ''/ψ is infinite. In other words, ψ is 0 for |x| > L/2.
 
  • #3
Please correct me if I am wrong but I don't think Shankar is wrong. He is discussing a general case(not specifically particle in a box) where V is infinite for x > L/2. Now time independent schrodinger says
ψ'' = [- 2 m(E-V)/hbar^2)]ψ.
So it is perfectly consistent mathematically that ψ'' is infinite. I couldn't get why ψ'' it can't be infinite? Ofcourse, even ψ can be 0, but the point is how do u decide if either ψ=0 or ψ'' is infinite?
 
  • #4
g.prabhakar said:
He is discussing a general case(not specifically particle in a box) where V is infinite for x > L/2. Now time independent schrodinger says
ψ'' = [- 2 m(E-V)/hbar^2)]ψ.
So it is perfectly consistent mathematically that ψ'' is infinite. I couldn't get why ψ'' it can't be infinite? Ofcourse, even ψ can be 0, but the point is how do u decide if either ψ=0 or ψ'' is infinite?

Well, "infinite" without further explanation means "undefined".
One needs to be more precise. E.g., you could take V to be a finite constant "C" for
|x| > L/2 and solve the Schroedinger equation for that case, under the conditions
that ψ is suitably continuous everywhere (meaning that ψ and its first derivative
must match at the L/2 boundaries). Then normalize the resulting wavefunction,
and look at what happens as [tex]C \to \infty[/tex].
 

FAQ: Particle in abox : continuous functions problem

What is the particle in a box problem?

The particle in a box problem is a commonly studied concept in quantum mechanics. It involves a particle confined to a one-dimensional box with infinite potential walls. This problem allows for the analysis of the energy levels and wave functions of the particle.

What is the significance of continuous functions in the particle in a box problem?

In the particle in a box problem, the particle's wave function is described by a continuous function that satisfies certain boundary conditions. This allows for the determination of the particle's energy levels and the probability of finding the particle at a specific location.

How does the size of the box affect the energy levels in the particle in a box problem?

The size of the box directly affects the energy levels of the particle in a box. As the size of the box decreases, the energy levels increase and become more closely spaced together. This is due to the confined nature of the particle, as it is limited to a smaller space and has less room for energy to spread out.

What is the difference between a particle in a box with fixed and free boundary conditions?

A particle in a box with fixed boundary conditions has a wave function that must equal zero at the boundaries of the box. This results in a discrete set of energy levels. On the other hand, a particle in a box with free boundary conditions has a wave function that is not restricted at the boundaries, resulting in a continuous set of energy levels.

How is the particle in a box problem related to real-world applications?

The particle in a box problem is a simplified model used to understand more complex quantum mechanical systems. It has applications in the study of semiconductors, where electrons are confined to a small space, as well as in the analysis of molecular bonding and the behavior of atoms in a solid state.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
994
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top