Partition Function Homework: Find Entropy Change for Isothermal Expansion

  • Thread starter Thread starter senan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the entropy change for one mole of gas undergoing isothermal expansion, using the provided van der Waals equation of state. The initial attempt incorrectly applied the ideal gas law instead of the specified equation. To find the entropy change, the correct expression for pressure must be derived from the van der Waals equation. The integral for entropy change should be evaluated using this accurate pressure formulation. Understanding the nuances of the van der Waals equation is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
senan
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One mole of a gas obeys the equation of state
(P +a/V2 )(1 −b/V) =RT/V
Find the change in entropy if one mole of the gas is isothermally expanded until the volume
is doubled. Express your answer in terms of the initial volume of the gas Vi.

Homework Equations



S2-S1=1/T Integral from Vi to 2Vi of PdV

The Attempt at a Solution



I replaced P with P=NkT/V

that leads to

S2-S1=-kln(2Vi/Vi)

as the answer was asked for in terms of Vi I'm not sure that's rightsorry titled the question wrong meant to title other Q as partition function
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is not right.

You are using the wrong equation of state.

It is stated in problem that the gas obeys a different equation of state, not the usual, PV=NkT.

You have to use the given equation of state to express P in terms of V.
 
By the way, that equation of state is called the van der Waals equation. It takes into account intermolecular forces and the volume of molecules instead of assuming an ideal gas.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top