Pentagon strike 9/11 (please do not lock)

  • News
  • Thread starter Aca
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Lock
In summary, a conversation was started about a controversial event, but it was quickly locked after someone became argumentative. The topic was reopened for discussion and some people shared their thoughts and doubts about the official explanation. Others found it offensive and disrespectful to question the events. The conversation became heated and it was suggested that the topic be locked again or moved to a specific forum for conspiracy theories. The conversation ended with a warning that violating forum guidelines could result in consequences.
  • #1
Aca
As the topic about this event has already been posted and locked right after because someone could not argue normally i wanted to open it again and hear other peoples' thought and views on this!

Yes, i watched the video and to be honest with you that whole thing about the attack on the Pentagon had been staged. As i am watching the video there was a still image of the 8F hole in the wall. A a spot where the airplane struck first...8 foot hole? Where is the wreckage? The wings? The LANDING GEAR never melts! The only thing that survives the impact and the heat - that has not been found either. No part of the airplane has ever been found! Hmm!

Other thing; the security camera never cought an airplane in its frame. Why? How many FPS does it take? 1? Or the airplane was trying to break the sound barrier! Or maybe it was something else travleing at much higher speeds? What could it be?:biggrin:

There is a certain group of people in US government that majority of US people are not aware of! They are destroying this country.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I find it offensive and reprehensible that you are trying to have this topic "discussed" in a public forum such as this. The fact is that an airliner full of people crashed into the pentagon, and that's all there is to it. There was no government plot to allow this to happen, there wasn't some fake airliner that plowed into the building, and the airliner definitely WASN'T empty.

Taking supposedly disparate facts and trying to weave them into an elaborate conspiracy is not productive or useful, it's an insult to the people that died on that day, AND the people that are working day and night to keep your butt safe from repeated attacks.

This topic should be immediately locked or at least relegated to the "Conspiracies and Debunking" area. :mad:
 
  • #3
Re-starting locked threads is also not permitted here. When we say it's locked, it's LOCKED.
 
  • #4
Also, flagrant, repeated, violations of forum guidelines will result in loss of privilages to post here.
 

FAQ: Pentagon strike 9/11 (please do not lock)

1. What evidence supports the claim that a plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11?

There are several pieces of evidence that support the claim that a plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11. First, there were multiple eyewitness accounts from individuals who saw a plane flying towards and crashing into the Pentagon. Additionally, there is security camera footage that captured the moment of impact. The remains of the plane were also found at the crash site, including the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder. Lastly, the 9/11 Commission Report concluded that American Airlines Flight 77, which was hijacked by terrorists, crashed into the Pentagon.

2. Why were there no visible plane debris at the Pentagon crash site?

Contrary to popular belief, there was actually a significant amount of plane debris found at the Pentagon crash site. However, since the plane hit the building at a high speed and angle, much of the debris was destroyed and scattered throughout the building. Additionally, the impact of the plane caused the building to collapse, further destroying any visible debris. The majority of the debris that was recovered was small and not recognizable as plane parts.

3. Was the damage to the Pentagon consistent with a plane crash?

Yes, the damage to the Pentagon was consistent with a plane crash. The plane hit the building at a high speed and angle, causing a large impact and explosion. The damage pattern on the building was also consistent with the shape and size of a plane, including the wingspan and tail section. Additionally, the location of the damage on the building matched the flight path of the hijacked plane.

4. Were there any witnesses who saw a different type of aircraft hit the Pentagon?

No, there were no credible witnesses who saw a different type of aircraft hit the Pentagon on 9/11. Despite various conspiracy theories and claims, there is no evidence to support the idea that a different type of aircraft, such as a missile, hit the Pentagon. The majority of eyewitness accounts and physical evidence all point to a commercial airplane crash.

5. How did the Pentagon withstand the impact of a plane crash?

The Pentagon was able to withstand the impact of a plane crash due to its reinforced construction. The building was designed to withstand bomb blasts and other forms of attack, making it more resilient to the impact of a plane crash. Additionally, the plane hit the building at an angle that caused it to slide along the side, rather than directly into the building, which may have lessened the impact. However, the damage was still significant and resulted in the collapse of a large section of the building.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Back
Top