- #36
PeterDonis
Mentor
- 46,985
- 23,422
Relative to what? I can assume that you mean relative to what you call a "stationary frame of reference", and I will make that assumption in my answer below, but you would be better served by not making people have to assume such things. Whenever you describe a scenario in relativity, you should always specify speeds, "moving", "stationary", etc., relative to something. If you're not sure what something to use, just adopt the common default of "the observer".BadgerBadger92 said:When something is traveling near the speed of light
If "going slower" refers to velocity or speed, as I defined those terms in post #26, then no.BadgerBadger92 said:due to time dilation, would that make it look like it’s going slower according to a stationary frame of reference?