Period & Radius of Circular Motion: Equations Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the period of a rotating object and the radius of rotation under constant applied force. Key equations include centripetal acceleration, represented as a_c = v^2/r, and the velocity equation v = 2πr/T, leading to a_c = 4π^2r/T^2. The conversation highlights that these equations apply to point particles rather than rigid rotators, which require different treatment. Additionally, the relationship between acceleration, force, and mass is noted, emphasizing the connection to the period of rotation. The thread concludes with a light-hearted exchange about the identity of a historical figure in an avatar.
JohnSimpson
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
I'm curious, are there any known equations relating the period of a rotating object to the radius of rotation (presumably while under a constant applied force)

What about any relating the applied force to the period?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there is a centripetal acceleration (the acceleration an object while it is moving in a circle, towards the center of the circle)
a_{c} = \frac{v^2}{r}
the velocity is distance (circumference of the circle) and the time is the period of one rotation
v = \frac{2 \pi r}{T}
then a_[c} = \frac{4 \pi^2 r}{T^2}


multiply acceration by force and taht gives the force period relation
 
stunner5000pt said:
multiply acceration by force and taht gives the force period relation

multiply acceration by mass and taht gives the force period relation.

Good analysis stunner !
 
WELL I am no expert in this field... one can attest to that
 
stunner5000pt said:
there is a centripetal acceleration (the acceleration an object while it is moving in a circle, towards the center of the circle)
a_{c} = \frac{v^2}{r}
the velocity is distance (circumference of the circle) and the time is the period of one rotation
v = \frac{2 \pi r}{T}
then a_[c} = \frac{4 \pi^2 r}{T^2}


multiply acceration by force and taht gives the force period relation
And what about the rigid rotators ?

marlon
 
quasar987 said:
I expected that you'd explain things like "what is a rigid rotator" and "how does the treatement of uniform circular motion made by stunner does not apply to it."
The given treatment only applies to point particles, not massive rotating objects (ie rigid rotators like a spinning sphere or rod)

I'd really like to know who is in your avatar, I assume he is some mathematician or physicist who lived some 235 years ago but I've never seen him before.
:biggrin: Nope, he's not a scientist, he is a far greater genius. You certainly know him.

regards
marlon
 
Mozart I believe.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top