Perpetual Motion From Satellite Revolution

In summary, the energy available from the orbital revolution of a nearby satellite is limited and not 'perpetual motion'.
  • #1
LotoSage
3
0
"Perpetual Motion" From Satellite Revolution

This is going to sound very far fetched, and I know very little about the laws of physics, admittedly (I don't even know if I'm posting this in the right area), but curiosity compels me.

I was wondering if it would be possible to harvest energy from the revolution of a nearby satellite as I've illustrated here: http://i.imgur.com/Z3u5i33.png

I use the moon as an example here, but that could be replaced with any nearby satellite. Would this work, in theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not sure what your sketch is trying to show. However, it is the policy at PF not to discuss PM and the like.

In any event, if you try to extract energy from an orbiting body, you are going cause that body to lose altitude over time. After all, it takes a fixed amount of energy per unit mass to put something into a particular orbit, so while your scheme may be long-lived, it cannot be 'perpetual'.
 
  • #3
Yeah, that's why I put it in quotes. While my understanding of physics is very limited I felt of course it couldn't last forever. I don't literally mean PM in this case (and that goes twicefold since it's disallowed), but simply a long term means of energy extraction. You seem to have gotten the right idea from my rudimentary illustration, and I thank you for your input.
 
  • #4
LotoSage said:
I use the moon as an example here, but that could be replaced with any nearby satellite. Would this work, in theory?
We are already extracting that energy in practice:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_power‎
 
  • #5
We'd have to expend more energy putting the satellites into orbit than we'd get back, so there's no point.
 
  • #6
LotoSage said:
I use the moon as an example here, but that could be replaced with any nearby satellite. Would this work, in theory?

It's all a matter of degree. The Moon is the largest object that will ever (could ever) be in orbit around the Earth. Any event that could introduce a comparable size of satellite would spell the end of the world for humans. Tidal surges or whaaaaat?

Tidal effects from the Moon (And the Sun, aamof) are many orders of magnitude greater than from anything else out there so those are the ones to go for. And we already do. From our point of view, the energy is 'inexhaustible' but it's not PM (verboten in PF).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

FAQ: Perpetual Motion From Satellite Revolution

What is perpetual motion?

Perpetual motion is the hypothetical concept of a machine that can continue to operate indefinitely without the need for any external energy source.

How does perpetual motion relate to satellite revolution?

The concept of perpetual motion is often applied to satellites in orbit around the Earth, as they appear to be in constant motion without the need for any additional fuel or energy.

Is perpetual motion possible?

As of now, perpetual motion is not possible according to the laws of thermodynamics, which state that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred. However, scientists continue to research and explore new technologies that may one day make perpetual motion a reality.

What are the potential benefits of perpetual motion in satellite revolution?

If perpetual motion were to become a reality, it could greatly benefit satellite revolution by reducing the need for costly and complicated fueling processes. This could also lead to longer-lasting and more efficient satellite missions, as well as reducing the impact of space debris.

What are the potential drawbacks of perpetual motion in satellite revolution?

One potential drawback of perpetual motion in satellite revolution is the potential for overpopulation of satellites in orbit. If satellites do not need to be refueled or replaced, there could be an excess of them in orbit, leading to potential collisions and other issues. Additionally, the development of perpetual motion technologies could be costly and time-consuming.

Similar threads

Back
Top