- #36
Dale
Mentor
- 35,837
- 14,294
There have been a lot of good comments, including some good recommendations where we as moderators can make improvements. However, I wanted to directly address one comment in the OP
If such experts cannot understand the question then they get irritated and if they get irritated too often then they leave. As such we deliberately place a higher burden on the questioner than is common at other sites.
I was a participant in the thread you referred to, and I have to admit that I found your question confusing. I also disliked in particular your rejection of a valid (and standard) approach because it violates some unspecified “spirit” of the problem. Think of how irritating it is to an expert (not myself in that case) to answer a question based on sound principles and have that standard approach, accepted by professional statisticians, rejected out of hand.
I honestly felt like you were toying with us, and that is something that we don’t want our experts to feel. So yes, that can indeed be a valid reason to close a thread
Here I disagree. One of the things that distinguishes PF from other forums is our large group of subject experts. Many of the things that we do are done in order to retain such experts, to provide them an environment which is different from the free-for-all at other sites where they can share their expertise.lalekl said:the inability of users to figure out a question is not grounds for closing a thread
If such experts cannot understand the question then they get irritated and if they get irritated too often then they leave. As such we deliberately place a higher burden on the questioner than is common at other sites.
I was a participant in the thread you referred to, and I have to admit that I found your question confusing. I also disliked in particular your rejection of a valid (and standard) approach because it violates some unspecified “spirit” of the problem. Think of how irritating it is to an expert (not myself in that case) to answer a question based on sound principles and have that standard approach, accepted by professional statisticians, rejected out of hand.
I honestly felt like you were toying with us, and that is something that we don’t want our experts to feel. So yes, that can indeed be a valid reason to close a thread
Last edited: