PF'ers Against Bad Science In Journalism

  • Thread starter Rach3
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Science
In summary, this conversation is about a thread that was previously started but is now being revived. The thread is dedicated to showcasing examples of lazy journalism misrepresenting basic science to the public, and only reputable news sources are allowed to be shared. The conversation also includes discussions about Pengwuino's absence, a recent school shooting, and a report on global warming's potential impact on the Northeast. The conversation also mentions a news article about active galactic nuclei and the use of exaggerated and misleading language in scientific reporting.
  • #36
This stuff is sad also:

DNA's simple and elegant structure - the "twisted ladder," with sugar-phosphate chains making up the "rails" and oxygen- and nitrogen-containing chemical "rungs" tenuously uniting the two halves - seems to be the work of an accomplished sculptor.

Yet the graceful, sinuous profile of the DNA double helix is the result of random chemical reactions in a simmering, primordial stew. Just how nature arrived at this molecule and its sister molecule, RNA, remains one of the greatest - and potentially unsolvable - scientific mysteries.
http://www.physorg.com/news79110174.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
DNA sounds delicious and sturdy enough to get me on my roof :biggrin:
 
  • #38
ShawnD said:
DNA sounds delicious and sturdy enough to get me on my roof :biggrin:

If you were a musician and could find a couple other musicians, preferably whose names started with 'N' and 'A', you could start a new band called Twisted Ladder.
 
  • #39
  • #41
Another one!

Ex-KGB Spy Contact Arrested Amid Nuke Probe
http://www.foxnews.com/ (front page, linking to the article http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,238629,00.html )

Hehe, there's the word "Nuke". As we know, Litvinenko died in the hands of nuclear weapons.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #42
So, the arrest didn't happen in a neutron diffraction or NMR lab?
 
  • #43
Gokul43201 said:
So, the arrest didn't happen in a neutron diffraction or NMR lab?

:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:

"amid nuke probe"
 
  • #44
Ex-KGB Spy Contact Arrested Amid Nuke Probe

He was smuggling microwave ovens.
 
  • #45
This one caught my eye today

Manned mission to moon in 8 yrs: Govt
http://www.ibnlive.com/news/manned-mission-to-moon-in-8-yrs-govt/40086-11.html

Really? An Indian moon mission in the next eight years? That sounds unbelievable

Minister of State in the Prime Minister's Office Prithviraj Chavan on Wednesday informed the Lok Sabha that India will send the first man to space in the next eight years, if all goes well.

Oh, wait a minute, you mean space. There's a lot more in space than the moon, you know :rolleyes:
 
  • #46
This one isn't funny, but I'm pretty sure it is wrong. This is one the Discovery Channel's website:
"The fundamental forces of nature emerged in that first second, the strongest of which was gravity. "
I was under the impression that gravity is the weakest of the fundamental forces by quite a bit.
 
  • #47
The dog is back. All hail the mighty dog. :biggrin:

Where the heck have you been?
 
  • #48
Hey trib, welcome back - again!

And yeah - where ya' been?

All hail the mighty dog.
Let's not get carried away now. :biggrin:
 
  • #49
I've been stuck with dial up internet for the past couple months and just didn't bother getting online much. Now I'm back to high speed and will probably be here more often.
 
  • #50
We used to refer to astronomically huge numbers as "sagans", in honor of Carl Sagan's Cosmos TV series. I haven't heard the term used that way in more than a decade, though.

Indeed, there are 100 billion stars in the galaxy...that's less than the national deficit! We should stop calling them astronomical numbers, and start calling the economical numbers. (R.P. Feynman)
 
  • #51
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19094136/?GT1=10056

Not too egregious, but "prism of light"?

Followed hard upon by this over-condensation:
Because light is "redshifted" to longer wavelengths as an
object moves away from an observer, the higher the redshift,
the further away the object is.
 
  • #52
BTW, in case people haven't notice this, Bob Crease has been collecting all of these "Science Bloopers" in the media and various entertainment sources. His Part II of Science Bloopers has just appeared.

http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/20/6/3/1

Zz.
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top