PhD Dilemma: Choosing Between Two Offers

  • Programs
  • Thread starter theophys2009
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Phd
In summary, the speaker is a first-year PhD student in theoretical physics who regrets their decision to choose a research topic and institution. They have lost passion for their work and wish they had chosen a different offer. They are considering quitting or changing their advisor but do not want to jeopardize their relationship. Another person in a similar situation advises having a discussion with the advisor and possibly changing advisors if needed. Reapplying to another PhD program is also suggested, although it may be difficult to be accepted due to already holding a doctorate.
  • #1
theophys2009
1
0
hi everyone,
I'm in the first year of my PhD in theoretical physics. I had to make a choice between three institutions/subjects last year, and I am starting to think that I made the completely wrong choice. Basically I was hestitating between two of my offers - one of which was exactly what I thought would be my field of choice and more theoretical, but location-wise not ideal (esp. as I wanted to live with my girlfriend), while the other was broader, a bit more 'unknown territory', but I finally chose it as I thought it wouldn't make that much of a difference subject-wise. Research now is not going bad, we're posting our first paper soon, but somehow I've lost all my passion for what I'm doing. I noticed this when I realized that I don't like talking about my work anymore - usually I love explaining what I'm working on and I've always had pretty precise ideas of what kind of work I enjoy in theoretical physics, but this isn't the case at all anymore. I still think what my supervisor does is interesting, and I like his down-to-earth/interested/varied approach to theophys. But it is not the kind of work that I had hoped to pursue, and now I wish more and more I had taken the other offer last year. I'm almost considering quitting and applying again, but I suppose that would mean I loose 2 years. Or I continue this PhD, hoping it gets better and hope to apply for postdocs that allow me to go more theoretical / more into the stuff I feel I'm interested in and good at. I just don't want to do anything drastic as it wouldn't be great for my relationship with my supervisor. Has anyone been in this kind of situation before?
B.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I started hating my research about the time we started publishing. I have since graduated, and I hate my research topic so much now that I have not applied to any post doc in that research area. I have been applying to different research areas that I didn't think would be too far-fetched, but so far only rejections. I wish that I would have taken the opportunity to change to a more interesting research topic while I was still a grad student (i.e. while they were still paying me, even if it was in bird crap). And that means, I wish that I would have changed my advisor, even after 3 years of working with him.

If you really do still find your advisor's research interesting, you need to have a thorough discussion with him/her about why you are working on the most uninteresting part of his/her research, or at least both of you try to figure out why you are not being inspired/challenged. Maybe you need to take on more responsibility? If that doesn't work, then I would change advisor in your situation. It is nothing (necessarily) personal against your advisor, and it is better in the long run for both you and your advisor to avoid the situation that I'm in right now, I think.
 
  • #3
turin said:
I started hating my research about the time we started publishing. I have since graduated, and I hate my research topic so much now that I have not applied to any post doc in that research area. I have been applying to different research areas that I didn't think would be too far-fetched, but so far only rejections. I wish that I would have taken the opportunity to change to a more interesting research topic while I was still a grad student (i.e. while they were still paying me, even if it was in bird crap). And that means, I wish that I would have changed my advisor, even after 3 years of working with him.

If you really do still find your advisor's research interesting, you need to have a thorough discussion with him/her about why you are working on the most uninteresting part of his/her research, or at least both of you try to figure out why you are not being inspired/challenged. Maybe you need to take on more responsibility? If that doesn't work, then I would change advisor in your situation. It is nothing (necessarily) personal against your advisor, and it is better in the long run for both you and your advisor to avoid the situation that I'm in right now, I think.

You can always reapply to another PhD progrmme but in an interesting one this time, I understand that the prospect of getting back to a student status isn't ideal, but being unemployed at 31 isn't as well...
 
  • #4
MathematicalPhysicist said:
You can always reapply to another PhD progrmme but in an interesting one this time, I understand that the prospect of getting back to a student status isn't ideal, but being unemployed at 31 isn't as well...

Most universities will not take on doctoral students who already hold a doctorate.
 
  • #5
cristo said:
Most universities will not take on doctoral students who already hold a doctorate.

Which are the most universities?
 

FAQ: PhD Dilemma: Choosing Between Two Offers

What factors should I consider when choosing between two PhD offers?

When deciding between two PhD offers, it's important to consider the research areas and projects available at each institution, the reputation and resources of the department and university, the funding and financial support offered, the location and living expenses, and the potential for career opportunities after graduation.

How do I know which PhD offer is the best fit for me?

The best PhD offer for you will depend on your individual goals, interests, and strengths. Take the time to research and visit each institution, talk to current students and faculty, and evaluate how well each program aligns with your academic and career aspirations.

What if one PhD offer is from a more prestigious university, but the other offers more funding?

This can be a difficult decision, but it's important to weigh the potential benefits of each offer. A prestigious university may provide more opportunities for networking and career advancement, while a fully funded offer can alleviate financial stress and allow you to focus solely on your research.

Should I base my decision solely on the PhD program or also consider the location and living expenses?

It's important to consider all aspects of the program, including the location and living expenses. If the location is not ideal for you or the cost of living is too high, it may impact your overall experience and ability to focus on your studies. However, if the program is a perfect fit, you may be able to find ways to make the location and expenses work for you.

Can I negotiate with the universities for a better offer?

It is possible to negotiate with universities for a better offer, especially if you have received multiple offers. However, be sure to approach negotiations professionally and have a clear understanding of what you are looking for and what you are willing to accept. Also, keep in mind that not all universities may be open to negotiation.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
538
Replies
21
Views
520
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
2K
Back
Top