- #1
bambambambambam
- 2
- 0
Philosophically speaking is there a need for a relativistic field to have no properties without an object on it? It seems like all throughout the history of mathematics there have been fields designed to describe the dynamics of specific particles, but isn't that necessarily a limit to their functionality?
Am I just imagining things or wouldn't it be possible to create a field with only properties relative to the objects it describes?
Am I just imagining things or wouldn't it be possible to create a field with only properties relative to the objects it describes?