Philosophical question about women's lingerie

  • Thread starter Smurf
  • Start date
In summary: Is that what it is?"In summary, the word "Panties" is plural but the word "Bra" is singular because philosophically speaking, giggle, giggle giggle, he said "panties and bra," giggle, giggle giggle.
  • #36
That's why he said "for yourself".

Little Kitty doesn't end with an 's'.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Math Is Hard said:
If I tried to sneak my Hemmi on board, do you think I'd be 'busted' for possessing weapons of math instruction? :biggrin:
You got a big grin out of me for that one.
:biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:
 
  • #38
Tsunami said:
Good call, MIH! :smile: :smile: :smile: Bras especially need to be burned! The guy who invented them needs to have a scrotogram done with the mammogram machine! :smile: :smile:
Yeowch! :eek:
Artman said:
You got a big grin out of me for that one.
Thanks! I try to recycle that gag whenever possible!
 
  • #39
I had occasion to visit a department store recently and noticed a manikin wearing butt-floss panties. I am baffled by this for several reasons. Surely it must at best be uncomfortable to have a string rubbing ones anus in such a manner. It was not a bikini to be worn for the pleasure of some viewing public and at best only a scant minimum protection for your outer garments could be provided. If panty lines are that much an issue why not simply save $14.95 and wear no undergarments at all? What is the psychological motivation ‘behind’ (tee hee hee) this?
 
  • #40
BoulderHead said:
I had occasion to visit a department store recently and noticed a manikin wearing butt-floss panties. I am baffled by this for several reasons. Surely it must at best be uncomfortable to have a string rubbing ones anus in such a manner. It was not a bikini to be worn for the pleasure of some viewing public and at best only a scant minimum protection for your outer garments could be provided. If panty lines are that much an issue why not simply save $14.95 and wear no undergarments at all? What is the psychological motivation ‘behind’ (tee hee hee) this?

Aww, c'mon, you're not supposed to wear them that long. If you wear them that long, then you're doing something wrong! What you described are definitely not intended to solve panty line problems (even thongs don't really accomplish that...they still leave "thong" lines instead of panty lines).
 
  • #41
Yes because us guys really hate those panty lines, umm yeah that's it, women should just wear no panties, to get rid of those hideous panty lines that us guys really hate. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
910
Replies
57
Views
16K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top