Photon Bouncing during APD Dead Time in Autocorrelation Measurement

  • A
  • Thread starter Theo2907
  • Start date
In summary, the study investigates the phenomenon of photon bouncing during the dead time of avalanche photodiodes (APDs) in autocorrelation measurements. It highlights how photon re-detection can lead to inaccuracies in timing measurements due to the finite dead time of the APDs. The findings suggest that this effect can significantly influence the results of autocorrelation experiments, necessitating adjustments in experimental design or data analysis to account for such artifacts.
  • #1
Theo2907
1
4
TL;DR Summary
Encountering strange results in dark counts of APD. Suspect reflections during APD dead time causing interference. Seeking quick insights to mitigate this issue. Any advice is appreciated.
Hey fellow researchers,

I'm currently working on an autocorrelation g(2) measurement setup using two Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs) connected through a multimode GRIN 50:50 beam splitter. Photons are delivered to the system via a multimode fiber (a PC-PC coupling to the beam splitter). However, I've been encountering a challenge and I believe it is related to the dead time of the APDs.
Below you can find a picture of the setup:
1702372340504.png


Before doing a complete g(2) measurement I wanted to check if my dark counts are incoherent (which should be the case). Unfortunately, I found that they are not incoherent, I did a measurement measuring the time difference between a measurement at APD 1 and APD 2 and I got peaks at around 20 ns and 80 ns.
You can see a screenshot of the graph below:

1702373825349.png


I couldn't explain it and no one in my lab has a good explanation for this phenomenon.

The peak at 20ns only happens when the beam splitter is actually coupled to the APDs, so a dark count measurement with the APDs not coupled to anything is completely incoherent (which is what we want).
The 80ns peak only happens when the multimode fiber(not present in the picture) is connected to the input fiber.

I do have a hypothesis though about this but I can't find any source online that verifies this.

I think that during the dead time of the APDs, incoming photons are being reflected, causing them to bounce back through the fiber. They are then reflected again at fiber couplings, the first one being the coupling between the input fiber and the MM fiber and there is another coupling from the MM fiber to another MM fiber.

Some people have advised me to use single-mode fibers instead and APC-APC couplings but if I use single-mode fiber my collection efficiency is not high enough and I don't get enough counts to make any measurement so that is not really an option. Later I want to measure light from single photon emitters in 4H-SiC so the collection efficiency is quite important.

I would greatly appreciate any insights, advice, or experiences you may have regarding this issue. Have you encountered similar challenges in your experiments? How did you address or mitigate the effects of this phenomenon?

Additionally, if anyone has recommendations for optimizing APD setups in autocorrelation measurements, please feel free to share. I'm open to suggestions and eager to learn from your expertise.

Thanks in advance for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Theo2907 said:
TL;DR Summary: Encountering strange results in dark counts of APD. Suspect reflections during APD dead time causing interference. Seeking quick insights to mitigate this issue. Any advice is appreciated.

I think that during the dead time of the APDs, incoming photons are being reflected, causing them to bounce back through the fiber.
I see there have been no responses yet so here's one: The time between the first small peak and the main peak is about 60ns. That represents a large path delay (20m??) and your image suggests you should expect less than 1m path lengths for any reflections. Could it be an instrumentation problem?
 

FAQ: Photon Bouncing during APD Dead Time in Autocorrelation Measurement

What is APD dead time in the context of autocorrelation measurements?

APD dead time is the period after the detection of a photon during which an avalanche photodiode (APD) is unable to detect another photon. This refractory period is crucial in autocorrelation measurements as it can affect the accuracy and interpretation of the data by introducing a time window where photon events are missed.

How does photon bouncing affect autocorrelation measurements during APD dead time?

Photon bouncing refers to the phenomenon where photons that arrive during the APD's dead time are not detected, leading to a loss of information. This can distort the autocorrelation function because the measurement assumes continuous detection capability. The missing photon counts can lead to underestimation of photon correlations and affect the overall analysis.

Can APD dead time be corrected in autocorrelation measurements?

Yes, there are correction methods for APD dead time in autocorrelation measurements. One common approach is to mathematically model the dead time and apply corrections to the autocorrelation function. This involves understanding the dead time characteristics of the APD and using algorithms to adjust the measured data accordingly.

What is the typical duration of dead time for an APD used in autocorrelation experiments?

The duration of dead time for an APD can vary depending on the specific device and its design. Typically, APD dead times range from a few nanoseconds to several tens of nanoseconds. It is essential to know the exact dead time of your APD to apply accurate corrections in autocorrelation measurements.

How can the impact of APD dead time be minimized in experimental setups?

To minimize the impact of APD dead time in experimental setups, researchers can use APDs with shorter dead times, employ multiple detectors to distribute the photon load, and carefully design experiments to reduce the photon flux to levels that minimize the likelihood of photons arriving during the dead time. Additionally, implementing robust correction algorithms in data analysis can help mitigate the effects of dead time on the results.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top