Physical interpretation of Parity?

In summary: But they still preserve the parity of the fermions, because that's the only way to get a faithful representation of L with no massless fermions!In summary, massive fermions can violate parity by transforming only (1/2, 0) or (0,1/2), but they still preserve the parity of the fermions.
  • #36
I noticed that most of my contributions in this thread are wrong in diverse details, misreadings, misconceptions, etc... I would prefer to delete all of them, it is not possible, so let me alert to the reader to not to believe any of my comments here. I will try to straight some comment on volume forms, parity, chirality, minkowski and euclidean, but it will be elsewhere and "elsewhen".
 

Similar threads

I C-parity π+ π- π0: Is (-1)^L (+1) Correct?
Replies
3
Views
2K
A G-parity - where does the minus sign come from?
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Does CPT Symmetry Apply to a Mirror World with Reversed Properties?
Replies
5
Views
1K
I How can I prove the parity violation potential in a P,T-symmetric system?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Low-lying excited states in nuclei
Replies
2
Views
2K
A Predicting the positive parity and zero spin of the Higgs boson?
Replies
7
Views
2K
B Why does parity give raise to pseudovectors?
Replies
14
Views
4K
Initial states ppbar can proceed to npi^0 with parity conserved
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Why Is Octupole Deformation Measurable in Nuclei but Not Dipole Deformation?
Replies
10
Views
1K
I Glueballs Observed For The First Time
Replies
10
Views
828

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top