Physics of Motorsports: Seat Bounce Debate

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProMed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of "seat bounce" in motocross, with a focus on how it enables riders to achieve greater height and distance when jumping. Various theories have emerged, including the role of spring rebound, the rider's center of gravity (COG), and the potential influence of muscular "springs" in the arms and legs. A dedicated forum, www.seatbounce.com, has been created to facilitate this debate among enthusiasts and experts. The goal is to clarify the mechanics behind seat bounce and reach a consensus on its underlying physics. Contributions from physics experts are sought to resolve the ongoing debate.
ProMed
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

There has been an ongoing debate on several motocross message boards over the last few months regarding the physics behind a "seat bounce" (pictured below). It has even lead to the creation of a discussion board in the last two weeks called www.seatbounce.com.

I am not here to spam this board since I have no affiliation other than I am looking for Physics experts to help solve this problem. Performing a seat bounce allows a rider to fly both farther and higher than just hitting the jump/ramp while standing. Some guys are saying it is caused by the springs rebounding propelling the rider other says it is from the COG being lower allowing more traction, and others are saying it is from "springs" in the riders arms/legs.

http://www.seatbounce.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=19

The thread above is the most recent debate opened up and hopefully one of you experts could help end this once and for all!

Thank you!
Paul

http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3119sm.jpg http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3120sm.jpg http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3121sm.jpg
http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3122sm.jpg http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3123sm.jpg http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3124sm.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could anyone help out with this?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top