Planar motion in central forces.

In summary, conservation of angular momentum implies that the motion of a body is restricted to a plane spanned by its position and momentum vectors, but for a 3 body problem this is not always the case. If there are forces directed towards a fixed point, then each planet's angular momentum is conserved, but for a non-fixed point the last term in the equation for angular momentum is zero, so the angular momentum can be non-constant.
  • #1
precise
13
0
I understand that in a two body problem under central force, corresponding to a potential V(r)(assume one body is massive compared to the other so that its motion is negligible), conservation of angular momentum implies the motion of the body to be in a plane spanned by position r and momentum p vectors.

But if we have three bodies, one of them massive, are the motions of other two bodies still restricted to a plane? Now the total angular momentum is L = L1 + L2 = r1 x p1 + r2 x p2, which is conserved. Mathematically, L could be kept constant while L1 and L2 are changing. Which means we could have motions of the two bodies in two planes orthogonal to each other, a non-planar motion. Is this allowed? If not, why? Then, what is reason for the planar motion?

In specific why is the solar system flat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
precise said:
why is the solar system flat?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmNXKqeUtJM
 
  • #3
If the forces on the planets are directed towards a fixed point O, (a good approximation if the Sun is much more massive than any planet), then each planet's angular momentum about O is separately conserved, since if r is the planet's displacement from O, and F is the force on the planet (towards O)…
[tex]\mathbf r \times \mathbf F = \mathbf r \times (-F\ \mathbf {\widehat{r}}) = 0[/tex]
But…
[tex] \mathbf r \times \mathbf F = \mathbf r \times \frac{d \mathbf p}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} (\mathbf r \times \mathbf p) - \frac{d \mathbf r}{dt} \times \mathbf p[/tex]
The last term is zero because
[tex]\frac{d \mathbf r}{dt} \times \mathbf p = \frac{d \mathbf r}{dt} \times m \frac {d \mathbf r}{dt} = 0[/tex]
So
[tex]\frac{d}{dt} (\mathbf r \times \mathbf p ) = 0\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \text {so} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathbf r \times \mathbf p = \mathbf{constant\ vector}[/tex]
Non-mathematically, the argument is simply that for any planet a force towards O can't give rise to a torque about O, so angular momentum about O is conserved.

So orbital planes can be at angles to each other, but in general won't be, because of collisions in the pre-planetary swirl, as A.T.'s excellent clip explains.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
precise: are you clearer now?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5


I can confirm that the motion of two bodies under a central force is indeed restricted to a plane due to the conservation of angular momentum. This is a fundamental law of physics and is based on the principle of conservation of energy and momentum. However, when we consider a system of three bodies, the motion of the other two bodies may not necessarily be restricted to a plane.

The total angular momentum in a three-body system is still conserved, but the individual angular momenta of the two smaller bodies can vary. This means that the motion of the two smaller bodies can occur in two planes that are orthogonal to each other, resulting in a non-planar motion.

The reason why the solar system appears to be flat is due to the initial conditions of its formation. The solar system was formed from a rotating cloud of gas and dust, and as it collapsed under its own gravity, it flattened out into a disk due to conservation of angular momentum. This phenomenon is known as the "conservation of angular momentum in a collapsing cloud" and is the reason why most planetary systems, including our own, are flat.

In summary, the planar motion in central forces is a result of the conservation of angular momentum, which is a fundamental law of physics. However, in a system of three bodies, the motion of the smaller bodies may not be restricted to a plane. The reason for the flatness of the solar system is due to the initial conditions of its formation and the conservation of angular momentum in a collapsing cloud.
 

Related to Planar motion in central forces.

1. What is planar motion in central forces?

Planar motion in central forces refers to the movement of a particle in a plane under the influence of a central force, which is a force that acts towards or away from a fixed point, known as the center of force. This type of motion is often observed in celestial objects orbiting around a central body, such as planets orbiting the sun.

2. How is planar motion in central forces different from other types of motion?

Unlike other types of motion, planar motion in central forces is constrained to a single plane. This means that the particle's movement can be described using two-dimensional coordinates, such as x and y, rather than three-dimensional coordinates.

3. What are some examples of central forces?

Some examples of central forces include gravity, electrostatic forces, and magnetic forces. These forces all act towards or away from a fixed point, making them suitable for describing planar motion.

4. What is the role of angular momentum in planar motion in central forces?

Angular momentum is a conserved quantity in planar motion in central forces, meaning it remains constant throughout the particle's movement. This is because the direction of the central force is always perpendicular to the particle's velocity, leading to a constant angular momentum.

5. How is planar motion in central forces related to Kepler's laws?

Kepler's laws describe the motion of planets around the sun, which can be considered as planar motion in central forces. Specifically, Kepler's first law states that planets follow elliptical orbits with the sun at one of the foci, while Kepler's second law states that planets sweep out equal areas in equal times, and Kepler's third law relates the orbital period and distance of a planet to the mass of the central body. These laws provide a mathematical description of the relationships between the central force, angular momentum, and orbital motion.

Similar threads

  • Mechanics
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
6
Views
229
Replies
2
Views
733
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top