Planck's Constant Related to Velocity of Light?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between Planck's constant (h) and the velocity of light (c), with some formulas suggesting a connection through division by c. Participants debate whether this indicates an inverse relationship between h and c, but one contributor asserts they are independent fundamental constants. The calculations involving h and c are contextual, depending on whether wavelength or frequency is used in experiments. The argument emphasizes that constants remain unchanged unless unit systems are altered. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity of their relationship in quantum mechanics and special relativity.
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
359
Reaction score
33
A few of the formulas that I have seen for calculating Planck's constant involve, amoung other things, dividing by the velocity of light. It appears as though the finiteness of the velocity of light and that Planck's constant is not zero are related. This would imply that QM and Special Relativity are related at a fundamental level. Comments? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
referframe said:
A few of the formulas that I have seen for calculating Planck's constant involve, amoung other things, dividing by the velocity of light.

Can you give an example or two?
 
Please see the attached PDF file describing how to measure and compute Planck's constant, h, from LED's. Does not this imply that h and c are inversely related?
 

Attachments

referframe said:
Please see the attached PDF file describing how to measure and compute Planck's constant, h, from LED's. Does not this imply that h and c are inversely related?

no, they are independent fundamental constants.
 
referframe said:
Please see the attached PDF file describing how to measure and compute Planck's constant, h, from LED's. Does not this imply that h and c are inversely related?

In the document, it is given that slope = hc/e.Then using slope,c and e we can find h.
My question is,for finding the slope itself we have to use h first.

Both h and c are just constants. we have so many equations in physics having constants in it. that doesn't mean constants are inter related or inter dependent? They don't change. That's why they are constants unless we change units.
 
The only reason c is in that equation is because in this experiment we use the wavelength of the light in the calculation, rather than its frequency. If we started out knowing or measuring the frequency of the light instead, c wouldn't appear in the calculation.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
704
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K