Planet moving in elliptical orbit around a star

In summary, a planet moving in an elliptical orbit around a star follows a path that is oval-shaped rather than circular. This orbital shape results from the gravitational forces between the planet and the star, causing the planet to vary its distance from the star throughout its orbit. The elliptical nature of the orbit means that the planet travels faster when it is closer to the star and slower when it is farther away, a phenomenon described by Kepler's laws of planetary motion.
  • #1
songoku
2,368
349
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Not sure
1716116482573.png


(a) I use centripetal force to solve this question, even though the question states elliptical orbit

$$\frac{GMm}{r^2}=m\omega^2 r$$
$$\omega^2 r^3=GM$$

So,
$$\omega_{A}^{2} r_{A}^{3}=\omega_{B}^{2} r_{B}^{3}$$
$$\frac{r_A}{r_B}=\left(\frac{\omega_{B}}{\omega_{A}}\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}$$

Is this correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't think you can use that formula in an elliptical orbit. There can be a radial component to the acceleration.
What do you know is conserved?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #3
haruspex said:
I don't think you can use that formula in an elliptical orbit.
Just let me emphasise that you most definitely cannot use that formula. It assumes that the radius is constant, which directly contradicts the assumptions of the problem.

As an additional hint, all you need to know here is that the potential is central. The actual functional behaviour of the force magnitude is irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #4
haruspex said:
I don't think you can use that formula in an elliptical orbit. There can be a radial component to the acceleration.
Is the radial component of acceleration the centripetal acceleration? Or is it something else?

haruspex said:
What do you know is conserved?
I think it should be angular momentum, so:
$$m v_A r_A = m v_B r_B$$

I don't think I can use ##v=\omega r## because it is not circular motion so how to relate the equation to ##\omega##?

Orodruin said:
As an additional hint, all you need to know here is that the potential is central. The actual functional behaviour of the force magnitude is irrelevant.
Sorry, what do you mean by "potential is central"?

Thanks
 
  • #5
songoku said:
I think it should be angular momentum, so:
$$m v_A r_A = m v_B r_B$$
Not exactly. The angular momentum depends only on the tangential component of the velocity.

songoku said:
I don't think I can use ##v=\omega r## because it is not circular motion so how to relate the equation to ##\omega##?
As such, ##\omega r## is definitely equal to the tangential component of the velocity by definition.

songoku said:
Sorry, what do you mean by "potential is central"?
A central potential depends only on ##r##, meaning the force is always pointing to the center.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #6
Orodruin said:
Just let me emphasise that you most definitely cannot use that formula. It assumes that the radius is constant, which directly contradicts the assumptions of the problem.
An apparent paradox is that, if one assumes that the planet moves in a straight line at constant velocity, one gets the correct answer for part (a).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #7
Seeing the question, the first part can be done using Kepler law which you have done correctly. For second part basic conservation of energy can be utilised to solve it.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #8
songoku said:
Is the radial component of acceleration the centripetal acceleration? Or is it something else?
Sorry, I should have been clearer. A radial component other than centripetal acceleration, i.e. ## \ddot r##
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #9
Super Man said:
the first part can be done using Kepler law which you have done correctly
If you mean Kepler III, the radius in that law refers to the semi-major axis. It is a law relating all planets orbiting the same star, not all positions of a given planet. It does not apply to the first part of this question.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #10
Orodruin said:
Not exactly. The angular momentum depends only on the tangential component of the velocity.
Maybe you mean something like this?
$$mv_Ar_A\sin \theta=mv_Br_B\sin \beta$$

where ##\theta## and ##\beta## is the angle between ##v## and ##r## at point A and B. Using ##v=\omega r##:
$$\omega_A r_{A}^{2}\sin \theta=\omega_B r_{B}^{2}\sin \beta$$

The question does not give information about ##\theta## and ##\beta##. How to continue?

haruspex said:
Sorry, I should have been clearer. A radial component other than centripetal acceleration, i.e. ## \ddot r##
Is ## \ddot r## the angular acceleration?

Thanks
 
  • #11
songoku said:
Using ##v=\omega r##:
No, ##v_B\sin(\beta)=\omega r_B##, etc.
songoku said:
Is ## \ddot r## the angular acceleration?
No, it is the rate of increase of the rate of increase of the radius. In a circular orbit it is zero.
The component of the acceleration vector in the radial direction is ##\ddot r-r\omega^2##. See e.g. https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Acceleration_Vector_in_Polar_Coordinates

Note also that the centripetal acceleration is not ##\omega^2r##. Centripetal acceleration is that component of the total acceleration which is normal to the velocity. If the velocity has a radial component then the centripetal acceleration is not entirely radial. The full expression for it in polar coordinates is horrendous.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #12
songoku said:
Maybe you mean something like this?
$$mv_Ar_A\sin \theta=mv_Br_B\sin \beta$$

where ##\theta## and ##\beta## is the angle between ##v## and ##r## at point A and B. Using ##v=\omega r##:
$$\omega_A r_{A}^{2}\sin \theta=\omega_B r_{B}^{2}\sin \beta$$
For angular momentum use ##~~\mathbf L =\mathbf r\times\mathbf p##.

Remember that ##~~\mathbf p=m\mathbf v## and ##\mathbf v=\mathbf \omega \times \mathbf r##. Put it together using the vector triple product rule.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #13
Super Man said:
Seeing the question, the first part can be done using Kepler law which you have done correctly.
This is incorrect.

Please refrain from confusing the OP by providing wrong answers.
 
  • #14
I understand.

Thank you very much for all the help and explanation haruspex, Orodruin, kuruman, Super Man
 

FAQ: Planet moving in elliptical orbit around a star

What is an elliptical orbit?

An elliptical orbit is a closed path around a star, where the shape of the orbit is an ellipse rather than a perfect circle. In this type of orbit, the distance between the planet and the star varies, being closest at one point (periapsis) and farthest at another (apoapsis).

What determines the shape of a planet's elliptical orbit?

The shape of a planet's elliptical orbit is determined by the gravitational interactions between the planet and the star, as well as the planet's initial velocity and position. The eccentricity of the ellipse, which measures how elongated it is, is influenced by these factors.

How does Kepler's First Law relate to elliptical orbits?

Kepler's First Law states that planets move in elliptical orbits with the star at one of the foci of the ellipse. This law highlights that the orbits are not circular and that the distance between the planet and the star changes over time.

What are the implications of a planet's elliptical orbit on its climate?

A planet's elliptical orbit can have significant implications for its climate. As the planet moves closer to the star, it experiences increased solar radiation, which can lead to warmer temperatures. Conversely, when it is farther away, the planet receives less solar energy, resulting in cooler temperatures. This variation can affect seasonal cycles and climate patterns.

Can a planet's orbit change from elliptical to another shape?

Yes, a planet's orbit can change over time due to gravitational interactions with other celestial bodies, such as other planets or stars. These interactions can lead to changes in the orbit's shape, size, and orientation, potentially altering the planet's path from elliptical to more circular or even hyperbolic under certain conditions.

Back
Top