Points on a Circle: Proving $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$

In summary, if four points $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ for r from 1 to 4 lie on a circle, it can be shown that the product of the four values, $m_1m_2m_3m_4$, equals 1.
  • #1
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
1,335
0
If $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ for r from 1 to 4 are 4 points that lie on a circle show that $m_1m_2m_3m_4= 1$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Perhaps something like this:

Let the circle be \(\displaystyle (x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = r^2\).

The points \(\displaystyle \left( x_r , \frac{1}{x_r} \right)\) are the points where (suitably selected) circle meets the function \(\displaystyle y = \frac{1}{x}\). Substituting this into the equation of the circle gives a quartic equation:

\(\displaystyle x^4 - 2ax^3 + (a^2 + b^2 - r^2)x^2 - 2bx + 1 =0.\)

If one then further assume that the circle was suitably selected, there exists four real roots for that equation, namely \(\displaystyle x_1, x_2, x_3\) and \(\displaystyle x_4\), which are the numbers we are interested in. As they are roots of the quartic equation, one can write equivalently

\(\displaystyle (x - x_1)(x - x_2)(x - x_3)(x - x_4) = x_1x_2x_3x_4 + \ldots = 0\).

Comparing these two ways to write the equation in question, one can conclude that \(\displaystyle x_1x_2x_3x_4 = 1\).
 
  • #3
kaliprasad said:
If $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ for r from 1 to 4 are 4 points that lie on a circle show that $m_1m_2m_3m_4= 1$
my solution:
(1) construct two lines $L_1:y=x\,\, and \,\,L_2: y=-x$
(2) construct $xy=1$
(3) construct a circle $x^2+y^2=k^2 \,\, (k>0)$
here $k$ big enough ,make sure (2) and (3) will have four intersetions A,B,C,D
(4)coordinates :$A(m_1,\dfrac{1}{m_1}), D(m_4,\dfrac{1}{m_4}),B(m_2,\dfrac{1}{m_2}), C(m_3,\dfrac{1}{m_3})$
(infact ABCD is a rectangle)
$\overline {AD}//L_1,\overline{BC}//L_1$
$\overline {AB}//L_2,\overline{CD}//L_2$
now we must have $m_1+m_3=0,m_2+m_4=0$
and $m_1\times m_4=-1,m_2\times m_3=-1$
$\therefore m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$
 
  • #4
Albert said:
my solution:
(1) construct two lines $L_1:y=x\,\, and \,\,L_2: y=-x$
(2) construct $xy=1$
(3) construct a circle $x^2+y^2=k^2 \,\, (k>0)$
here $k$ big enough ,make sure (2) and (3) will have four intersetions A,B,C,D
(4)coordinates :$A(m_1,\dfrac{1}{m_1}), D(m_4,\dfrac{1}{m_4}),B(m_2,\dfrac{1}{m_2}), C(m_3,\dfrac{1}{m_3})$
(infact ABCD is a rectangle)
$\overline {AD}//L_1,\overline{BC}//L_1$
$\overline {AB}//L_2,\overline{CD}//L_2$
now we must have $m_1+m_3=0,m_2+m_4=0$
and $m_1\times m_4=-1,m_2\times m_3=-1$
$\therefore m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$
I never said that circle has centre at origin
 
  • #5
kaliprasad said:
I never said that circle has centre at origin

I know you will question this ,it does not matter where the centre locate
if the origin translate from (0,0) to (a,b),all ther points will also translate relatively ,and the result will not change
 
  • #6
Albert said:
I know you will question this ,it does not matter where the centre locate
if the origin translate from (0,0) to (a,b),all ther points will also translate relatively ,and the result will not change

it matters because shifting (0,0) to (a,b) changes $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ to $(a + m_r,b + \frac{1}{m_r})$ no longer reciprocals
 
  • #7
kaliprasad said:
it matters because shifting (0,0) to (a,b) changes $(m_r,\frac{1}{m_r})$ to $(a + m_r,b + \frac{1}{m_r})$ no longer reciprocals
View the diagram:

View attachment 5564
 

Attachments

  • m1m2m3m4=1.jpg
    m1m2m3m4=1.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 67
Last edited:
  • #8
Albert said:
View the diagram:

Albert, please attach your images here in the challenges forum inline so they can be hidden within the spoiler, and not show up as an attachment, outside of the spoiler defeating the purpose of using the spoiler tags. This can easily be done by using the "Insert Image" tool on our toolbar. :)
 
  • #9
My solution
we have general equation of a circle
$x^2+y^2+ 2gx + 2fy + c = 0$
let a point $p,\frac{1}{p}$ be on the circle
then we get
$p^2 + \frac{1}{p^2} + 2gp + \frac{2f}{p} + c = 0$
or $p^4 + 1 + 2gp^3 + 2fp + cp^2=0$
or $p^4 + 2gp^3 + cp^2 + 2fp + 1=0$
the 4 roots are $m_1,m_2,m_3,m_4$ and hence product of roots = $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$ (the constant term)
 

FAQ: Points on a Circle: Proving $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$

What is a circle and its properties?

A circle is a shape that is formed by a set of points that are equidistant from a fixed point called the center. The distance from the center to any point on the circle is called the radius. The diameter is a line segment that passes through the center and has endpoints on the circle. The circumference is the distance around the circle, and it is equal to 2π times the radius.

What is the theorem for proving $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$?

The theorem for proving $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$ is known as the "Inscribed Angle Theorem." It states that if an angle is inscribed in a circle and its vertex is on the circle, then the measure of the inscribed angle is half the measure of the intercepted arc.

How can we use the Inscribed Angle Theorem to prove $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$?

In this case, we can use the Inscribed Angle Theorem to prove $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$ by inscribing the four angles in a circle and showing that the measure of each angle is half the measure of the intercepted arc. Since the sum of the angles in a circle is 360 degrees, and the intercepted arc is the entire circumference of the circle, we can then conclude that $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$.

What do $m_1$, $m_2$, $m_3$, and $m_4$ represent in the equation $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$?

In this equation, $m_1$, $m_2$, $m_3$, and $m_4$ represent the measures of the four angles inscribed in the circle. Each angle is formed by two rays that intersect the circle at two different points.

What is the significance of proving $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$?

Proving $m_1m_2m_3m_4=1$ is significant because it demonstrates the relationship between the measures of inscribed angles and the intercepted arcs in a circle. This relationship can be used to solve various problems and prove other theorems in geometry.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top