Pointwise Convergence For Induced Distributions

In summary, we are looking for a sequence of locally integrable functions in U that converge pointwise but do not converge in the weak* topology. Previous attempts at using typical examples of "integral breaking" functions have failed. One possible solution is to define a sequence of functions where each function is 1 in a small neighborhood of a point and 0 elsewhere. However, this sequence does not converge weakly* and instead converges pointwise to the Dirac delta distribution.
  • #1
Kreizhn
743
1

Homework Statement



If [itex] U \subseteq \mathbb R^n [/itex] find a sequence of locally integrable functions [itex] f_n \in L^1_{\text{loc}}(U) [/itex] which converge pointwise, but whose induced distributions
[tex] \langle f_n, \cdot \rangle: C_c^\infty(U) \to \mathbb R, \qquad \langle f_n, \phi \rangle = \int_U f_n \phi [/tex]
do not converge in the weak* topology.

The Attempt at a Solution


It would seem like the typical examples of "integral breaking" functions do not work here. In particular, I have tried examples of functions which spread ([itex] \frac1n\chi_{(0,n)} [/itex]), congregate ([itex] \frac n2 \chi_{[-1/n,1/n]} [/itex]) et cetera, but these do not seem to work. In particular, I think that it is because these choice of functions are not only locally integrable, but are integrable on all of [itex] \mathbb R [/itex] and converge weakly in [itex] L^p [/itex]; in fact, each of the above converge to the Heaviside and delta distributions respectively. Any ideas would be useful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
EDIT: Thanks to the help below I have made some headway. The idea is to set f_n(x) = \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{2^k} \chi_{[x-1/2^k,x+1/2^k)} . That is, for each point we define a function which is 1 in a small neighborhood of that point and 0 elsewhere. Then, we can easily compute the integral of these functions as \int f_n = \sum_{k=1}^n 2^{-k+1} . This is not convergent, so we have found a sequence which does not converge weakly*. It is also easy to see that this sequence converges pointwise; in fact, it converges to the Dirac delta distribution in the pointwise sense.
 

FAQ: Pointwise Convergence For Induced Distributions

What is pointwise convergence for induced distributions?

Pointwise convergence for induced distributions is a mathematical concept used to analyze the convergence of a sequence of probability distributions to a specific distribution. It involves examining the convergence of the probability of a specific event as the number of trials or observations increases.

How is pointwise convergence different from other types of convergence?

Pointwise convergence for induced distributions is different from other types of convergence, such as uniform convergence, because it focuses on the convergence of individual events rather than the overall behavior of the distribution. This allows for a more detailed analysis of the behavior of the sequence of distributions.

What are some real-world applications of pointwise convergence for induced distributions?

Pointwise convergence for induced distributions is commonly used in statistics, probability theory, and other fields to analyze the convergence of experimental or observational data. It can also be applied in areas such as finance and economics to analyze the convergence of market trends or other data.

How is pointwise convergence for induced distributions mathematically proven?

The mathematical proof of pointwise convergence for induced distributions involves using the definition of convergence and various probability theorems to show that the probability of a specific event converges to a value as the number of trials or observations increases. This proof can vary depending on the specific sequence of distributions being analyzed.

What are some potential limitations of using pointwise convergence for induced distributions?

One potential limitation of pointwise convergence for induced distributions is that it can be sensitive to the choice of the specific event being analyzed. This means that the convergence behavior may vary depending on the specific event chosen, leading to potentially different conclusions about the overall convergence of the sequence of distributions. Additionally, pointwise convergence does not provide information about the rate or speed of convergence, which may be important in certain applications.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
999
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
779
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top