- #1
joriarty
- 62
- 0
I'm struggling to understand Poisson brackets a little here... excerpt from some notes:
I am, however, stumped on how this Poisson bracket has been computed. I presume ra and Aa(r) are my canonical coordinates, and I have [tex] \dot{r}_a = p_a - \frac{e}{c}A_a (r) [/tex] with [tex] A_a = \frac{1}{2}\epsilon _{abc}B_br_c [/tex]
Unfortunately, my calculations on paper aren't getting anywhere! Could someone please shed some light here? I suspect something is wrong with the canonical coordinates I'm trying to use to do the derivatives for the Poisson brackets, or maybe I'm getting my indices muddled.
Thanks :)
We’ve seen in the example of section 4.1.3 that a particle in a magnetic field [tex] \textbf{B} = ∇×\textbf{A} [/tex]
is described by the Hamiltonian
[tex] H = \frac{1}{2m}\left( \textbf{p} - \frac{e}{c} \textbf{a} (\textbf{r} ) \right)^2 = \frac{m}{2} \dot{\textbf{r}}^2 [/tex]
where, as usual in the Hamiltonian, [tex] \dot{\textbf{r}} [/tex] is to be thought of as a function of r and p. It’s a simple matter to compute the Poisson bracket structure for this system: it reads
[tex]\{ m\dot{r} _a , m\dot{r} _b \} = \frac{e}{c}\epsilon _{abc} B_c [/tex]
I am, however, stumped on how this Poisson bracket has been computed. I presume ra and Aa(r) are my canonical coordinates, and I have [tex] \dot{r}_a = p_a - \frac{e}{c}A_a (r) [/tex] with [tex] A_a = \frac{1}{2}\epsilon _{abc}B_br_c [/tex]
Unfortunately, my calculations on paper aren't getting anywhere! Could someone please shed some light here? I suspect something is wrong with the canonical coordinates I'm trying to use to do the derivatives for the Poisson brackets, or maybe I'm getting my indices muddled.
Thanks :)