A Polarization in a 3 level system

Malamala
Messages
345
Reaction score
28
Hello! I am asking this question from a molecular physics perspective (i.e. diatomic molecule placed in an external electric field), but it's quite general in terms of the formulation. I have a 2 level system (call the levels ##\ket{0}## and ##\ket{1}##) that can be connected by an electric field through the Stark interaction. The Hamiltonian of the system is (I call the energies of the 2 levels in the absence of electric field ##E_1## and ##E_2##):

$$
\begin{pmatrix}
E_0 & -D_{01}E \\
-D_{01}E & E_1
\end{pmatrix}
$$
with ##D_{01} = \braket{0|D|1}##. If I diagonalize this, I get (say for the lowest energy state), something of the form: ##\ket{\tilde{0}} = a\ket{0}+b\ket{1}##, with ##a^2+b^2=1##. Then, the polarization in the ground state is given by:

$$p = \frac{\braket{\tilde{0}|D|\tilde{0}}}{D_{01}}$$
Thus, for a very small external field, ##b## is very small and the polarization is close to zero, while for a very large field, I have ##a=b=\sqrt{2}/2## and thus the polarization is 1, as expected i.e. the molecule is fully polarized in a large external field. However, if I add a 3rd level, connected to ##\ket{1}## by a dipole interaction, the Hamiltonian becomes:

$$
\begin{pmatrix}
E_0 & -D_{01}E & 0\\
-D_{01}E & E_1 & -D_{12}E \\
0 & -D_{12}E & E_2
\end{pmatrix}
$$
with ##D_{12} = \braket{1|D|2}## (which doesn't need to be equal to ##D_{01}## in general and I also assume that the dipoles are real numbers). Now, the ground state wavefunction is ##\ket{\tilde{0}} = a\ket{0}+b\ket{1}+c\ket{2}##, but I am not sure how to define the polarization anymore. I know I still need to take the expectation value: ##\braket{\tilde{0}|D|\tilde{0}} = 2abD_{01}+2bcD_{12}## but I am not sure what to divide this by (the same way I divided by ##D_{01}## before), or if I need a different definition. I know I need to have the same behaviour i.e. close to zero poalrization at low field and close to 1 at high field, but I am not sure how to get this in the case of multiple levels. Thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top