- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading Joseph J. Rotman's book: A First Course in Abstract Algebra with Applications (Third Edition) ...
I am currently focused on Section 3.5 From Numbers to Polynomials ...
I need help with an aspect of the proof of Lemma 3.67 ...
The relevant text from Rotman's book is as follows:View attachment 4640In the proof of the above Lemma, we read the following:
" ... ... If \(\displaystyle p(x) | f(x)\), then \(\displaystyle d(x) = p(x)\), for \(\displaystyle p(x)\) is monic. ... ... "Can someone please explain how \(\displaystyle p(x) | f(x)\) and \(\displaystyle p(x)\) being monic implies that \(\displaystyle d(x) = p(x)\) ... ...
Hope someone can help ... ...
Peter*** EDIT ***
I have just realized that I do not understand how the second line of the proof works ... so if someone can also help me with that, i would appreciate it very much ...
I am currently focused on Section 3.5 From Numbers to Polynomials ...
I need help with an aspect of the proof of Lemma 3.67 ...
The relevant text from Rotman's book is as follows:View attachment 4640In the proof of the above Lemma, we read the following:
" ... ... If \(\displaystyle p(x) | f(x)\), then \(\displaystyle d(x) = p(x)\), for \(\displaystyle p(x)\) is monic. ... ... "Can someone please explain how \(\displaystyle p(x) | f(x)\) and \(\displaystyle p(x)\) being monic implies that \(\displaystyle d(x) = p(x)\) ... ...
Hope someone can help ... ...
Peter*** EDIT ***
I have just realized that I do not understand how the second line of the proof works ... so if someone can also help me with that, i would appreciate it very much ...
Last edited: