Polynomials & Real Numbers: Find Remainder & No. of Divisors

  • Thread starter sambarbarian
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Thinking
In summary, the conversation was about two questions, one involving finding the remainder when a polynomial is divided by a quadratic expression and the other involving finding the number of positive divisors that divide one number but not another. The expert suggested using polynomial long division for the first question and factoring the quadratic divisor for the second question. The OP had trouble factoring the quadratic and the expert suggested reviewing high school algebra. In the end, the expert guided the OP to factor the quadratic and start the second question by writing the numbers as products of powers of 2 and 5.
  • #36
Now you are just guessing. The critical point is that [itex]10^{998}= (5^{998})(2^{998})[/itex]. That means that [itex]5^n[/itex] is a factor for every n from 0 to 998. But it also means that [itex]2^n[/itex], for n= 0 to 99 is also a factor. That's 2(999) right there, and and we haven't even started combining "2"s and "5"s.

One way to look at it is this: there are 999 ways to find factors using only "5"s and there are 999 ways using only "2"s. And the "fundamental theorem of counting" says that the if there are m ways of doing one thing and n ways of doing another (independently of the first) then there are mn ways of doing both.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
HallsofIvy said:
Now you are just guessing. The critical point is that [itex]10^{998}= (5^{998})(2^{998})[/itex]. That means that [itex]5^n[/itex] is a factor for every n from 0 to 998. But it also means that [itex]2^n[/itex], for n= 0 to 99 is also a factor. That's 2(999) right there, and and we haven't even started combining "2"s and "5"s.

Yes, but everything from [itex]5^0[/itex] to [itex]5^{998}[/itex] are also factors of [itex]10^{998}[/itex] and are therefore excluded from consideration. Ditto for powers of 2. Every number that should be considered should have as a factor, either [itex]2^{999}[/itex] or [itex]5^{999}[/itex] or both (the only one that has both is [itex]10^{999}[/itex]).
 
  • #38
i don't quite understand
 
  • #39
sambarbarian said:
i don't quite understand

OK, start by considering the numbers with [itex]2^{999}[/itex] as a factor. Now, everything from [itex]2^{999}.5^0[/itex] to [itex]2^{999}.5^{998}[/itex] divides [itex]10^{999}[/itex] but not [itex]10^{998}[/itex]. Agreed? So how many is that?

Now consider numbers with [itex]5^{999}[/itex] as a factor in a similar way. How many do we have here?

Finally, don't forget [itex]2^{999}.5^{999} = 10^{999}[/itex] itself, which I avoided including till the last step so that we don't double-count it.
 
  • #40
Curious3141 said:
OK, start by considering the numbers with [itex]2^{999}[/itex] as a factor. Now, everything from [itex]2^{999}.5^0[/itex] to [itex]2^{999}.5^{998}[/itex] divides [itex]10^{999}[/itex] but not [itex]10^{998}[/itex]. Agreed? So how many is that?

2^999 . 5^0 is equal to 2^999 . 5^1 ,,, (998 - 1) = 997 ? i am not sure
 
  • #41
sambarbarian said:
2^999 . 5^0 is equal to 2^999 . 5^1 ,,, (998 - 1) = 997 ? i am not sure

You're not thinking clearly, and what you wrote makes no sense.

[itex]2^{999}.5^0 = 2^{999}[/itex] because any nonzero number raised to the power zero is 1.

[itex]2^{999}[/itex] is still a number you have to include in the count because it divides [itex]10^{999}[/itex] but not [itex]10^{998}[/itex].

I asked you to count the numbers from [itex]2^{999}.5^0[/itex] to [itex]2^{999}.5^{998}[/itex] going in consecutive exponents of 5. This is equivalent to counting the integers from 0 to 998 inclusive. You replied with '997'. Sure of this?

How many integers are there from 0 to 1 inclusive? 0 to 10? 0 to 998?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top